错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

An international study of clinical, demographic, and competence-related determinants of communication with professionals

  • Juan Ignacio Arraras,
  • Johannes Giesinger,
  • Omar Shamieh,
  • Iqbal Bahar,
  • Michael Koller,
  • Anne Bredart,
  • Anna Costantini,
  • Eva Greimel,
  • Monika Sztankay,
  • Lisa M. Wintner,
  • Marina Carreiro de Sousa,
  • Hiroto Ishiki,
  • Meropi Kontogianni,
  • Maja Wolan,
  • Yuichiro Kikawa,
  • Anne Lanceley,
  • Ioannis Gioulbasanis,
  • Amelie Harle,
  • Uxue Zarandona,
  • Dagmara Kulis,
  • Tihana Gašpert,
  • Karin Kuljanic

摘要

Purpose

This study aims to identify a combination of clinical, demographic, and patient competence determinants of patients’ communication with doctors and nurses in an international sample of cancer patients.

Methods

For our cross-sectional study, cancer patients assessed their communication with their doctors or nurses at the start of their treatment. Patients completed EORTC communication questionnaire QLQ-COMU26 to assess ten areas of communication with their doctor or nurses plus another item to assess how competent they felt when communicating with professionals. Bivariable analyses and multivariable linear regression models were performed separately for each QLQ-COMU26 area.

Results

Included in the study were 988 patients from 15 centres in 13 countries (five cultural areas). Higher age was related to higher level of communication in eight QLQ-COMU26 areas. Males reported higher level of communication in three areas. Lower levels of studies and higher level of perceived competence when communicating with professionals were related to higher level of communication in the ten QLQ-COMU26 areas. Communication was of a higher level with nurses than with doctors in four areas. Having received previous treatment with the same doctor or group of nurses was related to higher communication levels in seven areas. Lack of comorbidity was related to higher communication levels in two areas. Various differences in determinants were found among tumour sites.

Conclusion

Our regression model has shown several relationships between communication and the demographic and clinical variables that may help identify patients at risk of poor communication. Future studies could focus on communication at diagnosis and in follow-up, and on areas such as assessing the particularities of communication between patient and professionals in relation to cancer type.