Scholarlink

<p>The growing number of sustainability standards, initiatives, and frameworks in the extraction sector has created a&#xa0;complex institutional landscape. This study examines how different governance instruments applicable to the European extractive sector vary in scope, institutional design, assessment logic, and ESG (environmental-social-governance) emphasis.</p><p>The assessment is based on qualitative desk research combining document analysis with a&#xa0;structured comparative framework. Nine widely used governance instruments were systematically examined regarding organizational architecture, compliance mechanisms, assessment level, verification approaches, and ESG weighting.</p><p>The findings show that sustainability governance in the sector is not a&#xa0;consistent or standardized system but a&#xa0;set of diverse instruments with different functions. Site-level instruments provide detailed operational insights but limit comparability, while company- and state-level instruments allow comparison but offer less detail. ESG priorities also vary widely. These differences indicate functional specialization, meaning that instruments tend to complement rather than replace each other.</p><p>Overall, sustainability governance in the European extractive sector is best understood as a&#xa0;complementary yet heterogenous system. Recent harmonization efforts suggest a&#xa0;possible move towards greater alignment. Understanding how these instruments interact in practice will be essential for improving coherence and effectiveness in sustainability governance.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Landschaft der Standards: Vergleichende Einblicke in die Nachhaltigkeitssteuerung im europäischen Rohstoffsektor

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月13日

查看全文
  • Maria Theresa Schober,
  • Stefanie Streit,
  • Michael Tost

摘要

The growing number of sustainability standards, initiatives, and frameworks in the extraction sector has created a complex institutional landscape. This study examines how different governance instruments applicable to the European extractive sector vary in scope, institutional design, assessment logic, and ESG (environmental-social-governance) emphasis.

The assessment is based on qualitative desk research combining document analysis with a structured comparative framework. Nine widely used governance instruments were systematically examined regarding organizational architecture, compliance mechanisms, assessment level, verification approaches, and ESG weighting.

The findings show that sustainability governance in the sector is not a consistent or standardized system but a set of diverse instruments with different functions. Site-level instruments provide detailed operational insights but limit comparability, while company- and state-level instruments allow comparison but offer less detail. ESG priorities also vary widely. These differences indicate functional specialization, meaning that instruments tend to complement rather than replace each other.

Overall, sustainability governance in the European extractive sector is best understood as a complementary yet heterogenous system. Recent harmonization efforts suggest a possible move towards greater alignment. Understanding how these instruments interact in practice will be essential for improving coherence and effectiveness in sustainability governance.