<p>The theory of forbidden 0–1 matrices generalizes Turán-style (bipartite) subgraph avoidance, Davenport-Schinzel theory, and Zarankiewicz-type problems, and has been influential in many areas, such as discrete and computational geometry, the analysis of self-adjusting data structures, and the development of the graph parameter <i>twin width</i>. The foremost open problem in this area is to resolve the <i>Pach-Tardos conjecture</i> from 2005, which states that if a forbidden pattern <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P\in \{0,1\}^{k\times l}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>×</mo> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is <i>acyclic</i>, meaning it is the bipartite incidence matrix of a forest, then <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {Ex}(P,n) = O(n\log ^{C_P} n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>Ex</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mi>O</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <msup> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </msub> </msup> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {Ex}(P,n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>Ex</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the maximum number of 1s in a <i>P</i>-free <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\times n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>×</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 0–1 matrix and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C_P\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a constant depending only on <i>P</i>. This conjecture has been confirmed on many small patterns, specifically all <i>P</i> with weight at most 5, and all but two with weight 6. The main result of this paper is a clean refutation of the Pach-Tardos conjecture. Specifically, we prove that <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {Ex}(S_0,n),\operatorname {Ex}(S_1,n) \ge n2^{\Omega (\sqrt{\log n})}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>Ex</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mo>Ex</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>n</mi> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msqrt> <mrow> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msqrt> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(S_0,S_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are the outstanding weight-6 patterns. We also prove sharp bounds on the entire class of <i>alternating</i> patterns <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((P_t)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, specifically that for every <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {Ex}(P_t,n)=\Theta (n(\log n/\log \log n)^t)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>Ex</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>t</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This is the first proof of an asymptotically sharp bound that is <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\omega (n\log n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Refutation of the Pach-Tardos Conjecture for 0–1 Matrices

  • Seth Pettie,
  • Gábor Tardos

摘要

The theory of forbidden 0–1 matrices generalizes Turán-style (bipartite) subgraph avoidance, Davenport-Schinzel theory, and Zarankiewicz-type problems, and has been influential in many areas, such as discrete and computational geometry, the analysis of self-adjusting data structures, and the development of the graph parameter twin width. The foremost open problem in this area is to resolve the Pach-Tardos conjecture from 2005, which states that if a forbidden pattern \(P\in \{0,1\}^{k\times l}\) P { 0 , 1 } k × l is acyclic, meaning it is the bipartite incidence matrix of a forest, then \(\operatorname {Ex}(P,n) = O(n\log ^{C_P} n)\) Ex ( P , n ) = O ( n log C P n ) , where \(\operatorname {Ex}(P,n)\) Ex ( P , n ) is the maximum number of 1s in a P-free \(n\times n\) n × n 0–1 matrix and \(C_P\) C P is a constant depending only on P. This conjecture has been confirmed on many small patterns, specifically all P with weight at most 5, and all but two with weight 6. The main result of this paper is a clean refutation of the Pach-Tardos conjecture. Specifically, we prove that \(\operatorname {Ex}(S_0,n),\operatorname {Ex}(S_1,n) \ge n2^{\Omega (\sqrt{\log n})}\) Ex ( S 0 , n ) , Ex ( S 1 , n ) n 2 Ω ( log n ) , where \(S_0,S_1\) S 0 , S 1 are the outstanding weight-6 patterns. We also prove sharp bounds on the entire class of alternating patterns \((P_t)\) ( P t ) , specifically that for every \(t\ge 2\) t 2 , \(\operatorname {Ex}(P_t,n)=\Theta (n(\log n/\log \log n)^t)\) Ex ( P t , n ) = Θ ( n ( log n / log log n ) t ) . This is the first proof of an asymptotically sharp bound that is \(\omega (n\log n)\) ω ( n log n ) .