Die „soziale Kontraindikation“: Ein neurologischer Praxisbericht
摘要
Seldom does a day go by at the hospital without an admission out of a ‚social indication‘. But is it just as easy to speak of a ‚social contraindication‘? This topic is avoided in practice since it is sparsely discussed in theory. This article examines the theme of social contraindication from the perspective of clinical neurology. A constructed casuistry contributes to the discussion of social aspects by defining the indication for individual cases. Methodologically, the Bochum Worksheet, conceived by the recently deceased bioethicist Professor Hans-Martin Sass, is revived as an almost forgotten method of ethical case discussion: How should healthcare professionals behave when patients and their relatives have diametrically opposed opinions regarding the situation of dependency so that a beneficial outcome for the patient is jeopardized?
ArgumentsA casuistic study, reflecting on the concepts of medical indication and relational autonomy, explains the omission of medical indication for social reasons from a practical and lifeworld perspective.
ConclusionsThis concept of a social contraindication should be considered as part of the harm-benefit assessment when deciding on the indication, without calling into question the autonomy of the patients themselves. Ethical consultation is a highly established way to secure the dialogue between the parties involved.