Scholarlink

<p>This study develops a season-aware machine-learning (ML) framework to predict hourly concentrations of PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> across İstanbul. A comprehensive 2021–2023 dataset was compiled from three co-located air-quality and meteorological monitoring stations that typify contrasting source regimes, i.e., a traffic-dominated urban site, a rural background site, and a semi-urban coastal site. Seven ML algorithms, namely eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Extra Trees (ETR), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR), were utilized to establish a holistic comparison scheme. Hyperparameters were optimized using five-fold cross-validated Bayesian search, and models were evaluated with various performance indicators on season-withheld test sets. In the winter months, ETR achieved a mean R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93 (RMSE ≈ 10&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup>) for PM<sub>10</sub> at Bağcılar, while XGBoost yielded R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88 for O<sub>3</sub> at the same site. Summer predictions were more challenging. PM<sub>10</sub> skill in rural Arnavutköy dropped to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.61 despite strong training fits, highlighting over-fitting risks under complex, non-stationary chemical conditions. By contrast, MLP maintained robust urban performance for PM<sub>2.5</sub> (summer test R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80) and KNN provided the most stable O<sub>3</sub> prediction in rural areas (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.74). To enhance interpretability, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was applied to the best-performing models, enabling a transparent assessment of how meteorological and co-pollutant inputs shaped predictions at each site. The proposed framework demonstrates that data-driven models can complement traditional air-quality modeling systems by providing station-level insights and interpretable relationships between pollutants and meteorological drivers, supporting air-quality assessment and policy-relevant analyses in rapidly urbanizing regions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Interpretable machine learning framework for air quality prediction in Istanbul using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月22日

查看全文
  • Enes Birinci,
  • Ömer Ekmekcioğlu,
  • Hüseyin Ozdemir,
  • Ali Deniz

摘要

This study develops a season-aware machine-learning (ML) framework to predict hourly concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and O3 across İstanbul. A comprehensive 2021–2023 dataset was compiled from three co-located air-quality and meteorological monitoring stations that typify contrasting source regimes, i.e., a traffic-dominated urban site, a rural background site, and a semi-urban coastal site. Seven ML algorithms, namely eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Extra Trees (ETR), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR), were utilized to establish a holistic comparison scheme. Hyperparameters were optimized using five-fold cross-validated Bayesian search, and models were evaluated with various performance indicators on season-withheld test sets. In the winter months, ETR achieved a mean R2 = 0.93 (RMSE ≈ 10 µg/m3) for PM10 at Bağcılar, while XGBoost yielded R2 = 0.88 for O3 at the same site. Summer predictions were more challenging. PM10 skill in rural Arnavutköy dropped to R2 = 0.61 despite strong training fits, highlighting over-fitting risks under complex, non-stationary chemical conditions. By contrast, MLP maintained robust urban performance for PM2.5 (summer test R2 = 0.80) and KNN provided the most stable O3 prediction in rural areas (R2 = 0.74). To enhance interpretability, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was applied to the best-performing models, enabling a transparent assessment of how meteorological and co-pollutant inputs shaped predictions at each site. The proposed framework demonstrates that data-driven models can complement traditional air-quality modeling systems by providing station-level insights and interpretable relationships between pollutants and meteorological drivers, supporting air-quality assessment and policy-relevant analyses in rapidly urbanizing regions.