Scholarlink

<p>This study explores the limitations of image-based structural health monitoring (SHM) techniques in detecting structural damage. Leveraging machine learning and computer vision, image-based SHM offers a scalable and efficient alternative to manual inspections. However, its reliability is impacted by challenges such as false positives, false negatives, and environmental variability, particularly in low base rate damage scenarios. The Base Rate Bias plays a significant role, as low probabilities of actual damage often lead to misinterpretation of positive results. This study uses both Bayesian analysis and a frequentist approach to evaluate the precision of damage detection systems, revealing that even highly accurate models can yield misleading results when the occurrence of damage is rare. Strategies for mitigating these limitations are discussed, including hybrid systems that combine multiple data sources, human-in-the-loop approaches for critical assessments, and improving the quality of training data. These findings provide essential insights into the practical applicability of image-based SHM techniques, highlighting both their potential and their limitations for real-world infrastructure monitoring.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessing uncertainty in image-based monitoring: addressing false positives, false negatives, and base rate bias in structural health evaluation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月26日

查看全文
  • Vagelis Plevris

摘要

This study explores the limitations of image-based structural health monitoring (SHM) techniques in detecting structural damage. Leveraging machine learning and computer vision, image-based SHM offers a scalable and efficient alternative to manual inspections. However, its reliability is impacted by challenges such as false positives, false negatives, and environmental variability, particularly in low base rate damage scenarios. The Base Rate Bias plays a significant role, as low probabilities of actual damage often lead to misinterpretation of positive results. This study uses both Bayesian analysis and a frequentist approach to evaluate the precision of damage detection systems, revealing that even highly accurate models can yield misleading results when the occurrence of damage is rare. Strategies for mitigating these limitations are discussed, including hybrid systems that combine multiple data sources, human-in-the-loop approaches for critical assessments, and improving the quality of training data. These findings provide essential insights into the practical applicability of image-based SHM techniques, highlighting both their potential and their limitations for real-world infrastructure monitoring.