Scholarlink

Background <p>Localization of suspected metastatic LNs during targeted robot-assisted lymphadenectomy is challenging due to anatomical variability and surrounding vital structures. Image-guided surgical navigation may improve intraoperative LN localization and completeness of oncologic dissection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and usability of surgical navigation for localization of suspected metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) during robot-assisted pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection.</p> Methods <p>Patients with one or more suspected metastatic LNs on preoperative imaging scheduled for robot-assisted pelvic or retroperitoneal LN dissection were prospectively included. A patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) model was automatically registered intraoperatively using electromagnetically tracked ultrasound of the bone surface. Real-time navigation was displayed via the da Vinci® TilePro™ as a 3D model or augmented reality overlay. A tracked pointer or instrument was used for LN localization. Accuracy was defined as the shortest distance between the surgeon-indicated LN and the corresponding 3D model. Usability was assessed using the system usability scale (SUS).</p> Results <p>Twenty patients with 40 target LNs were included. One para-aortic LN was inaccessible in a patient with a BMI of 52&#xa0;kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The remaining 39 LNs were successfully localized using navigation with a median accuracy of 0.8&#xa0;mm (IQR 0.0–3.0). Navigation supported surgical decision-making and LN localization, with a SUS score of 70 (IQR 64–73). Registration time was 7 (5–10)&#xa0;min. No navigation-related complications occurred.</p> Conclusions <p>Surgical navigation enabled highly accurate LN localization during robot-assisted pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection. The technique is safe, feasible, and supports targeted oncologic surgery and intraoperative decision-making. In the future, wireless tracking systems or simultaneous localization and mapping techniques could allow broader clinical implementation of the navigation technique.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Real-time surgical navigation for intraoperative lymph node localization during targeted robot-assisted pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月27日

查看全文
  • Marijn A. J. Hiep,
  • Wouter J. Heerink,
  • Harald C. Groen,
  • Lisanne P. J. Venix,
  • Laura Aguilera Saiz,
  • Enzo Kerkhof,
  • Henk G. van der Poel,
  • Pim J. van Leeuwen,
  • Maaike W. van de Kamp,
  • Quirijn R. J. G. Tummers,
  • Theo J. M. Ruers

摘要

Background

Localization of suspected metastatic LNs during targeted robot-assisted lymphadenectomy is challenging due to anatomical variability and surrounding vital structures. Image-guided surgical navigation may improve intraoperative LN localization and completeness of oncologic dissection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and usability of surgical navigation for localization of suspected metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) during robot-assisted pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection.

Methods

Patients with one or more suspected metastatic LNs on preoperative imaging scheduled for robot-assisted pelvic or retroperitoneal LN dissection were prospectively included. A patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) model was automatically registered intraoperatively using electromagnetically tracked ultrasound of the bone surface. Real-time navigation was displayed via the da Vinci® TilePro™ as a 3D model or augmented reality overlay. A tracked pointer or instrument was used for LN localization. Accuracy was defined as the shortest distance between the surgeon-indicated LN and the corresponding 3D model. Usability was assessed using the system usability scale (SUS).

Results

Twenty patients with 40 target LNs were included. One para-aortic LN was inaccessible in a patient with a BMI of 52 kg/m2. The remaining 39 LNs were successfully localized using navigation with a median accuracy of 0.8 mm (IQR 0.0–3.0). Navigation supported surgical decision-making and LN localization, with a SUS score of 70 (IQR 64–73). Registration time was 7 (5–10) min. No navigation-related complications occurred.

Conclusions

Surgical navigation enabled highly accurate LN localization during robot-assisted pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection. The technique is safe, feasible, and supports targeted oncologic surgery and intraoperative decision-making. In the future, wireless tracking systems or simultaneous localization and mapping techniques could allow broader clinical implementation of the navigation technique.

Graphical abstract