Scholarlink

Background <p>Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and absent peristalsis. Treatment options include Pneumatic Dilation, Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, and Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM). A focal distal esophageal dilation at the myotomy site, termed blown-out myotomy (BOM), has been reported in 9%&#xa0;–&#xa0;32% of patients and may be associated with reflux, esophageal retention, and treatment failure. The clinical significance of BOM remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of BOM following E-POEM.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search of electronic databases and conference proceedings from inception through November 2025 identified prospective and retrospective studies reporting the prevalence or clinical features of BOM after E-POEM. The primary outcome was pooled BOM prevalence. Secondary outcomes included symptom severity (Eckardt score), myotomy characteristics, and associations with achalasia subtypes. Studies reporting ≤ 3 BOM cases or lacking extractable data were excluded. Pooled proportions were calculated using a fixed-effects model. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg–Mazumdar test. Mean Eckardt scores were compared using an unpaired t-test.</p> Results <p>Four studies comprising 947 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of BOM was 11.16% (95% CI: 9.28%&#xa0;–13.25%). No evidence of publication bias was detected (Kendall’s tau-<i>b</i> = 0.33; <i>p</i> = 0.75). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean myotomy length was 10.39 ± 1.82&#xa0;cm in the BOM group and 11.23 ± 1.46&#xa0;cm in the non-BOM group. Pretreatment Eckardt scores were similar (6.67 vs 6.63), as were 3-month post–E-POEM scores (2.05 vs 1.93). Pooled odds ratios for BOM were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.47–1.13) for type I achalasia, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.53–1.19) for type II, and 1.38 (95% CI: 0.80–2.38) for type III.</p> Conclusions <p>BOM occurs in a minority of patients following E-POEM. Across studies, BOM did not show consistent associations with symptoms or procedural characteristics.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of blown-out myotomy after E-POEM for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月3日

查看全文
  • Yusuf Kagzi,
  • Srinivas Reddy Puli

摘要

Background

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and absent peristalsis. Treatment options include Pneumatic Dilation, Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, and Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM). A focal distal esophageal dilation at the myotomy site, termed blown-out myotomy (BOM), has been reported in 9% – 32% of patients and may be associated with reflux, esophageal retention, and treatment failure. The clinical significance of BOM remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of BOM following E-POEM.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases and conference proceedings from inception through November 2025 identified prospective and retrospective studies reporting the prevalence or clinical features of BOM after E-POEM. The primary outcome was pooled BOM prevalence. Secondary outcomes included symptom severity (Eckardt score), myotomy characteristics, and associations with achalasia subtypes. Studies reporting ≤ 3 BOM cases or lacking extractable data were excluded. Pooled proportions were calculated using a fixed-effects model. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg–Mazumdar test. Mean Eckardt scores were compared using an unpaired t-test.

Results

Four studies comprising 947 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of BOM was 11.16% (95% CI: 9.28% –13.25%). No evidence of publication bias was detected (Kendall’s tau-b = 0.33; p = 0.75). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean myotomy length was 10.39 ± 1.82 cm in the BOM group and 11.23 ± 1.46 cm in the non-BOM group. Pretreatment Eckardt scores were similar (6.67 vs 6.63), as were 3-month post–E-POEM scores (2.05 vs 1.93). Pooled odds ratios for BOM were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.47–1.13) for type I achalasia, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.53–1.19) for type II, and 1.38 (95% CI: 0.80–2.38) for type III.

Conclusions

BOM occurs in a minority of patients following E-POEM. Across studies, BOM did not show consistent associations with symptoms or procedural characteristics.