Scholarlink

Background <p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal lesions is more challenging than for other sites, leading to the common use of traction devices to improve submucosal visibility and endoscope maneuverability. This study evaluated the outcomes and efficiency of a novel Elastic Traction Device (ETD), a rotatable and reopenable device, in colorectal ESD.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively analyzed lesions (20–50&#xa0;mm) resected at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center from July 2022 to January 2024. Lesions were divided into the conventional ESD group (C-ESD) and the ETD group (T-ESD); the T-ESD group was further split into the schedule (S) group, where ETD was planned early, and the rescue (R) group, where continued treatment was difficult. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline factors.</p> Results <p>Of 260 lesions, 136 were in the C-ESD group and 124 in the T-ESD group. After PSM, 101 lesions from each group were analyzed. No significant difference was observed in procedure time (47.13 ± 36.86 vs. 52.96 ± 39.17&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> = 0.27) or dissection speed (33.54 ± 21.38 vs. 28.38 ± 18.81 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>p</i> = 0.07). Perforation rates were similar (4.0% vs. 5.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.51). In the S and R groups (58 and 33 lesions, respectively), procedure time was shorter in the S group (43.93 vs. 70.30&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) with faster dissection (35.80 vs. 20.23 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Post-ETD attachment, dissection speed improved significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>Although the ETD did not consistently reduce procedure time or improve dissection speed, its planned and early application may offer potential benefits. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to clarify its optimal role and clinical value in colorectal ESD.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Planned use of a novel Elastic Traction Device improves efficiency in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity-score matched study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月29日

查看全文
  • Shotaro Ishizaka,
  • Tomoaki Tashima,
  • Tomonori Kawasaki,
  • Masami Sano,
  • Tsubasa Ishikawa,
  • Takahiro Muramatsu,
  • Yuki Shiko,
  • Yohei Kawasaki,
  • Yumi Mashimo,
  • Shomei Ryozawa

摘要

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal lesions is more challenging than for other sites, leading to the common use of traction devices to improve submucosal visibility and endoscope maneuverability. This study evaluated the outcomes and efficiency of a novel Elastic Traction Device (ETD), a rotatable and reopenable device, in colorectal ESD.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed lesions (20–50 mm) resected at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center from July 2022 to January 2024. Lesions were divided into the conventional ESD group (C-ESD) and the ETD group (T-ESD); the T-ESD group was further split into the schedule (S) group, where ETD was planned early, and the rescue (R) group, where continued treatment was difficult. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline factors.

Results

Of 260 lesions, 136 were in the C-ESD group and 124 in the T-ESD group. After PSM, 101 lesions from each group were analyzed. No significant difference was observed in procedure time (47.13 ± 36.86 vs. 52.96 ± 39.17 min, p = 0.27) or dissection speed (33.54 ± 21.38 vs. 28.38 ± 18.81 mm2/min, p = 0.07). Perforation rates were similar (4.0% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.51). In the S and R groups (58 and 33 lesions, respectively), procedure time was shorter in the S group (43.93 vs. 70.30 min, p < 0.01) with faster dissection (35.80 vs. 20.23 mm2/min, p < 0.0001). Post-ETD attachment, dissection speed improved significantly (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although the ETD did not consistently reduce procedure time or improve dissection speed, its planned and early application may offer potential benefits. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to clarify its optimal role and clinical value in colorectal ESD.

Graphical abstract