Objective <p>To investigate the effectiveness of pre-placed pancreatic duct stents on improving outcomes of pancreatic enucleation for benign tumors, a procedure often discouraged by postoperative complications, such as pancreatic fistulae.</p> Methods <p>This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 148 patients with benign tumors located in the head, neck, and body of the pancreas between February 2021 and February 2024. Thirty-four patients received stent placement by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 1–2&#xa0;days before surgery, while 114 did not. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups: stent (<i>n</i> = 30) and non-stent (<i>n</i> = 60). Outcomes compared included enucleation success rate, incidence of pancreatic fistulae, hospital stay, procedural costs, pancreatic function deficiency, and quality of life.</p> Results <p>Pre-placement of stents significantly increased enucleation success rate (86.7% vs. 28.3%, <i>p</i> = 1.763 × 10<sup>−7</sup>), facilitated more laparoscopic surgeries (86.7% vs. 41.7%, <i>p</i> = 4.9 × 10<sup>−5</sup>), and shortened hospital stays (median 7.5&#xa0;days vs. 11&#xa0;days, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The stent group also showed a lower incidence of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction (10.3% vs. 35.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.016) and higher quality of life scores (91.2 ± 5.8 vs. 85.5 ± 13.6, <i>p</i> = 0.019). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or overall costs. Additionally, the distance between tumor and main pancreatic duct was shorter in the stent group (4.2 ± 2.2&#xa0;mm vs. 6.2 ± 2.5&#xa0;mm, <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p> Conclusion <p>Pre-placement of pancreatic duct stents significantly enhances enucleation success rate, reduces hospital stays, preserves pancreatic function, and improves quality of life. These findings advocate the use of pre-placed stents in enucleation procedures. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these outcomes.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Optimizing pancreatic enucleation for benign tumors: the role of pre-placed pancreatic duct stents—a retrospective cohort study

  • Baoyang Hu,
  • Yiming Yin,
  • Chun Liu,
  • Chao He,
  • Heng Zou,
  • Zhongtao Liu,
  • Fang Lv,
  • Yu Wen,
  • Wei Liu

摘要

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of pre-placed pancreatic duct stents on improving outcomes of pancreatic enucleation for benign tumors, a procedure often discouraged by postoperative complications, such as pancreatic fistulae.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 148 patients with benign tumors located in the head, neck, and body of the pancreas between February 2021 and February 2024. Thirty-four patients received stent placement by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 1–2 days before surgery, while 114 did not. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups: stent (n = 30) and non-stent (n = 60). Outcomes compared included enucleation success rate, incidence of pancreatic fistulae, hospital stay, procedural costs, pancreatic function deficiency, and quality of life.

Results

Pre-placement of stents significantly increased enucleation success rate (86.7% vs. 28.3%, p = 1.763 × 10−7), facilitated more laparoscopic surgeries (86.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 4.9 × 10−5), and shortened hospital stays (median 7.5 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.001). The stent group also showed a lower incidence of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction (10.3% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.016) and higher quality of life scores (91.2 ± 5.8 vs. 85.5 ± 13.6, p = 0.019). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or overall costs. Additionally, the distance between tumor and main pancreatic duct was shorter in the stent group (4.2 ± 2.2 mm vs. 6.2 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Pre-placement of pancreatic duct stents significantly enhances enucleation success rate, reduces hospital stays, preserves pancreatic function, and improves quality of life. These findings advocate the use of pre-placed stents in enucleation procedures. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these outcomes.

Graphical Abstract