Radioactive stent versus normal stent insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the comparative efficacy and safety of radioactive stents versus normal metal stents for the management of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).
MethodsA comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted to identify pertinent studies up to June 2024. The primary focus of this meta-analysis is on stent patency, postoperative survival, and the incidence of complications.
ResultsThe meta-analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of complications, such as bleeding (p = 0.32), cholangitis (P = 0.19), pancreatitis (P = 0.43), and cholecystitis (P = 0.99), between the two types of stents. However, the radioactive stent demonstrated a significant improvement in both stent patency time (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.50–0.73; P < 0.001) and patient survival time (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.53–0.74, P < 0.001).
ConclusionThe results indicate that radioactive stents could present a more effective option compared to traditional stents for palliative management of malignant biliary obstruction, resulting in prolonged stent patency and potentially enhancing survival rates.