错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Long-term patient reported outcomes after robotic, laparoscopic, and open ventral hernia repair

  • Brian T. Fry,
  • Abigail L. Kappelman,
  • Joshua K. Sinamo,
  • Desmond Huynh,
  • Leah J. Schoel,
  • Alexander K. Hallway,
  • Anne P. Ehlers,
  • Sean M. O’Neill,
  • Michael A. Rubyan,
  • Jenny M. Shao,
  • Dana A. Telem

摘要

Introduction

Current evidence demonstrates questionable incremental benefit of robotic abdominal wall (ventral) hernia repair when compared to other approaches. However, data are mainly limited to 30-day outcomes and do not capture long-term patient reported outcomes (PROs) where the robotic may provide distinct advantages.

Methods

We analyzed patients who underwent ventral hernia repair from January 2020–September 30, 2022 in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR). Validated PROs included the Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory (VHRI), PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a (Pain 3a), and HerQLes quality of life measures. Survey weighting was employed to reduce non-response bias and balance respondents with the overall COHR population. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of operative approach with answering “Yes” to the 3 VHRI questions, reporting a worse than average Pain 3a score, and reporting a below median HerQLes score. Models accounted for patient, hernia, and operative characteristics.

Results

Our sample included 1583 patients undergoing hernia repair, of which 507 (32.0%) were robotic, 202 (12.8%) were laparoscopic, and 874 (55.2%) were open. Median follow up time was 1.3 years (IQR 1.2–1.5). Patient characteristics were similar across approaches. Robotic repairs were more often performed electively, on larger hernias, and with mesh. After controlling for covariates, a robotic approach was associated with a lower predicted probability of reporting a bulge [19.5% (95% CI 15.7–23.2%)] than a laparoscopic approach [26.8% (95% CI 20.4–33.2%)], but was no different than an open approach [18.8% (95% CI 16.1–21.6%)]. No other differences in PROs were found by approach.

Conclusions

We found a lower likelihood of reporting a bulge after robotic ventral hernia repair when compared with a laparoscopic approach, but no difference when compared with an open approach. No other differences in long-term PROs were found when comparing robotic to laparoscopic or open approaches.