<p>If <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {P}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a lattice polytope (i.e., <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {P}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the convex hull of finitely many integer points in&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), Ehrhart’s famous theorem (1962) asserts that the integer-point counting function <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|t \mathcal {P}\cap \mathbb {Z}^d|\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mo>∩</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a polynomial in the integer variable&#xa0;<i>t</i>. Chapoton (2016) proved that, given a fixed integral form <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda : \mathbb {Z}^d \rightarrow \mathbb {Z}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, there exists a polynomial <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {cha}_\mathcal {P}^\lambda (q,x) \in \mathbb {Q}(q)[x]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mo>cha</mo> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> such that the refined enumeration function <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sum _{ \textbf{m}\in t \mathcal {P}} q^{ \lambda (\textbf{m}) }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mo>∑</mo> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">m</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mi>q</mi> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold">m</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> equals the evaluation <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {cha}_\mathcal {P}^\lambda (q, [t]_q)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mo>cha</mo> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mi>q</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where, as usual, <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\([t]_q:= \frac{ q^t - 1 }{ q-1 }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mi>q</mi> </msub> <mo>:</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <msup> <mi>q</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; naturally, for <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(q=1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> we recover the Ehrhart polynomial. Our motivating goal is to view Chapoton’s work through the lens of Brion’s Theorem (1988), which expresses the integer-point structure of a given polytope via that of its vertex cones. It turns out that this viewpoint naturally yields various refinements and extensions of Chapoton’s results, including explicit formulas for <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {cha}_\mathcal {P}^\lambda (q,x)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mo>cha</mo> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, its leading coefficient, and its behavior as <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t \rightarrow \infty \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also prove an analogue of Chapoton’s structural and reciprocity theorems for rational polytopes (i.e., with vertices in&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Q}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Closer Look at Chapoton’s q-Ehrhart Polynomials

  • Matthias Beck,
  • Thomas Kunze

摘要

If \(\mathcal {P}\) P is a lattice polytope (i.e., \(\mathcal {P}\) P is the convex hull of finitely many integer points in  \(\mathbb {R}^d\) R d ), Ehrhart’s famous theorem (1962) asserts that the integer-point counting function \(|t \mathcal {P}\cap \mathbb {Z}^d|\) | t P Z d | is a polynomial in the integer variable t. Chapoton (2016) proved that, given a fixed integral form \(\lambda : \mathbb {Z}^d \rightarrow \mathbb {Z}\) λ : Z d Z , there exists a polynomial \(\operatorname {cha}_\mathcal {P}^\lambda (q,x) \in \mathbb {Q}(q)[x]\) cha P λ ( q , x ) Q ( q ) [ x ] such that the refined enumeration function \(\sum _{ \textbf{m}\in t \mathcal {P}} q^{ \lambda (\textbf{m}) }\) m t P q λ ( m ) equals the evaluation \(\operatorname {cha}_\mathcal {P}^\lambda (q, [t]_q)\) cha P λ ( q , [ t ] q ) where, as usual, \([t]_q:= \frac{ q^t - 1 }{ q-1 }\) [ t ] q : = q t - 1 q - 1 ; naturally, for \(q=1\) q = 1 we recover the Ehrhart polynomial. Our motivating goal is to view Chapoton’s work through the lens of Brion’s Theorem (1988), which expresses the integer-point structure of a given polytope via that of its vertex cones. It turns out that this viewpoint naturally yields various refinements and extensions of Chapoton’s results, including explicit formulas for \(\operatorname {cha}_\mathcal {P}^\lambda (q,x)\) cha P λ ( q , x ) , its leading coefficient, and its behavior as \(t \rightarrow \infty \) t . We also prove an analogue of Chapoton’s structural and reciprocity theorems for rational polytopes (i.e., with vertices in  \(\mathbb {Q}^d\) Q d ).