Scholarlink

<p>As a&#xa0;result of not being readmitted to the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) after the Second World War, the accompanying loss of contact with international psychoanalysis and the introduction of the health insurance system in 1967, different psychoanalytic identifications developed within the German Psychoanalytical Society (DPG). For some, this led to a&#xa0;search for a&#xa0;new direction and a&#xa0;turn towards high-frequency analysis, while others viewed this Freudian tradition with critical distance or even rejection. In the authorʼs view, whether a&#xa0;psychoanalyst trained in the DPG works at a&#xa0;high frequency, i.e. 4–5h, is not only a&#xa0;conscious technical decision but more an expression of unconscious identifications that are usually generatively conveyed and passed on in the training context. From the authorʼs point of view, it is essential to become conscious of these identifications in order not to capitulate to them but to be able to dare to make changes and transgressions beyond occasionally difficult group identifications, which often demand belief and loyalty.</p><p>Based on a&#xa0;brief case vignette, central conscious identifications in the authorʼs development as a&#xa0;psychoanalyst are presented and linked to technical treatment considerations, which she considers essential for the high-frequency analysis.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Hochfrequenz und Identifizierung

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月20日

查看全文
  • Sylvia Schulze

摘要

As a result of not being readmitted to the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) after the Second World War, the accompanying loss of contact with international psychoanalysis and the introduction of the health insurance system in 1967, different psychoanalytic identifications developed within the German Psychoanalytical Society (DPG). For some, this led to a search for a new direction and a turn towards high-frequency analysis, while others viewed this Freudian tradition with critical distance or even rejection. In the authorʼs view, whether a psychoanalyst trained in the DPG works at a high frequency, i.e. 4–5h, is not only a conscious technical decision but more an expression of unconscious identifications that are usually generatively conveyed and passed on in the training context. From the authorʼs point of view, it is essential to become conscious of these identifications in order not to capitulate to them but to be able to dare to make changes and transgressions beyond occasionally difficult group identifications, which often demand belief and loyalty.

Based on a brief case vignette, central conscious identifications in the authorʼs development as a psychoanalyst are presented and linked to technical treatment considerations, which she considers essential for the high-frequency analysis.