Scholarlink

<p>Throughout the history of psychoanalysis, the practice of working with dreams has undergone theoretical modifications. Still, psychoanalysts give it great significance and describe it as enriching and creative. This paper investigates how psychotherapists in training experience working with dreams in their training analysis. To examine their subjective experience, we chose a&#xa0;qualitative research design and conducted five interviews with people in psychoanalytic/psychodynamic training. Interview data were elicited using a&#xa0;less structured and therefore modified version of the problem-centered interview by Witzel (<CitationRef CitationID="CR18">2000</CitationRef>). The transcribed interview data served as the basis of the qualitative analysis using the <i>Constructivist Grounded Theory</i> of Charmaz (<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">2014</CitationRef>). The qualitative analysis of the data revealed three core categories: <i>analytic framework</i>, <i>becoming visible</i> and <i>mutual construction</i>. Each of the core categories subdivides into subordinate categories, which are arranged in a&#xa0;network. The results are discussed regarding the categories—in particular considering cross-connections with each other and with categories from interviews with psychoanalysts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Zum subjektiven Erleben des Erzählens eigener Träume in der Lehranalyse

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月13日

查看全文
  • Miriam Henkel,
  • Lilly Hofmann

摘要

Throughout the history of psychoanalysis, the practice of working with dreams has undergone theoretical modifications. Still, psychoanalysts give it great significance and describe it as enriching and creative. This paper investigates how psychotherapists in training experience working with dreams in their training analysis. To examine their subjective experience, we chose a qualitative research design and conducted five interviews with people in psychoanalytic/psychodynamic training. Interview data were elicited using a less structured and therefore modified version of the problem-centered interview by Witzel (2000). The transcribed interview data served as the basis of the qualitative analysis using the Constructivist Grounded Theory of Charmaz (2014). The qualitative analysis of the data revealed three core categories: analytic framework, becoming visible and mutual construction. Each of the core categories subdivides into subordinate categories, which are arranged in a network. The results are discussed regarding the categories—in particular considering cross-connections with each other and with categories from interviews with psychoanalysts.