<p>Consider shuffling a deck of <i>n</i> cards, labeled 1 through <i>n</i>, as follows: at each time step, pick one card uniformly with your right hand and another card, independently and uniformly with your left hand; then swap the cards. How long does it take until the deck is close to random? Diaconis and Shahshahani showed that this process undergoes cutoff in total variation distance at time <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t = \lfloor (n\log {n})/2 \rfloor \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>⌊</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>⌋</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Confirming a conjecture of N.&#xa0;Berestycki, we prove the definitive “hitting time” version of this result: let <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\tau \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>τ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote the first time at which all cards have been touched. The total variation distance between the stopped distribution at <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\tau \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>τ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and the uniform distribution on permutations is <i>o</i>(1); this is best possible, since at time <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\tau -1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the total variation distance is at least <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((1+o(1))e^{-1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mi>o</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Hitting time mixing for the random transposition walk

  • Vishesh Jain,
  • Mehtaab Sawhney

摘要

Consider shuffling a deck of n cards, labeled 1 through n, as follows: at each time step, pick one card uniformly with your right hand and another card, independently and uniformly with your left hand; then swap the cards. How long does it take until the deck is close to random? Diaconis and Shahshahani showed that this process undergoes cutoff in total variation distance at time \(t = \lfloor (n\log {n})/2 \rfloor \) t = ( n log n ) / 2 . Confirming a conjecture of N. Berestycki, we prove the definitive “hitting time” version of this result: let \(\tau \) τ denote the first time at which all cards have been touched. The total variation distance between the stopped distribution at \(\tau \) τ and the uniform distribution on permutations is o(1); this is best possible, since at time \(\tau -1\) τ - 1 , the total variation distance is at least \((1+o(1))e^{-1}\) ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) e - 1 .