<p>We discuss a general method to obtain quantitative improvements of correlation inequalities and apply it to arm estimates for Bernoulli bond percolation on <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Our first result is that the two-arm exponent is strictly larger than twice the one-arm exponent and can be seen as a quantitative improvement of the Harris-FKG inequality. This answers a question of Garban and Steif [<CitationRef CitationID="CR10">10</CitationRef>, Open Problem 13.6], which was motivated by the study of exceptional times in dynamical percolation [<CitationRef CitationID="CR24">24</CitationRef>, section 9]. Our second result is that the monochromatic arm exponents are strictly larger than their polychromatic versions, and can be seen as a quantitative improvement of Reimer’s main lemma [<CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>, Lemma 4.1]. This second result is not new; it was already proved by Beffara and Nolin [<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>] using a different argument.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Strict inequalities for arm exponents in planar percolation

  • Ritvik Ramanan Radhakrishnan,
  • Vincent Tassion

摘要

We discuss a general method to obtain quantitative improvements of correlation inequalities and apply it to arm estimates for Bernoulli bond percolation on \({\mathbb {Z}}^2\) Z 2 . Our first result is that the two-arm exponent is strictly larger than twice the one-arm exponent and can be seen as a quantitative improvement of the Harris-FKG inequality. This answers a question of Garban and Steif [10, Open Problem 13.6], which was motivated by the study of exceptional times in dynamical percolation [24, section 9]. Our second result is that the monochromatic arm exponents are strictly larger than their polychromatic versions, and can be seen as a quantitative improvement of Reimer’s main lemma [1, Lemma 4.1]. This second result is not new; it was already proved by Beffara and Nolin [3] using a different argument.