<p>Exome sequencing (ES) has become a primary tool for diagnosing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), yet the interpretation of genetic variants in large, heterogeneous cohorts presents significant challenges that automated pipelines often fail to resolve. This study showcases the complexities and novel findings derived from a decade-long analysis of 419 Italian NDD patient-parent trios. While ES established a molecular diagnosis in 36.5% of cases (53.8% in syndromic presentations), our investigation moves beyond diagnostic yield to highlight the critical value of manual curation integrated with deep phenotyping. We demonstrate how this rigorous approach uncovers complex disease mechanisms, revealing that variants initially misclassified as missense or stop-gain are, in fact, pathogenic splicing defects confirmed by functional analysis. Furthermore, we resolve the paradox of pathogenic truncating <i>PPM1D</i> variants in control databases by demonstrating their somatic mosaic nature, a crucial insight for population data interpretation. Our work also refines gene-disease correlations by challenging the established role of <i>MID2</i> in NDDs, providing further evidence for <i>DSCAM</i> as a high-confidence risk gene, and expanding the known phenotypic spectrum of disorders, such as a novel <i>GNAI2</i>-related syndrome lacking expected immune dysfunction. This study underscores that navigating the complexities of large NDD cohorts requires a detailed, expert-driven approach to not only enhance diagnostic yield but also to advance our fundamental understanding of rare disease genetics.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The NeuroWES project: lessons learned from comprehensive phenotyping and genetic analysis of neurodevelopmental disorders over a decade

  • Simona Cardaropoli,
  • Lisa Pavinato,
  • Slavica Trajkova,
  • Diana Carli,
  • Verdiana Pullano,
  • Flavia Palermo,
  • Alessandro Mussa,
  • Elisa Biamino,
  • Vincenzo Antona,
  • Andrea Zonta,
  • Paola Dimartino,
  • Mariia Zadorozhna,
  • Alessandro Bruselles,
  • Roberto Keller,
  • Barbara Pasini,
  • Enrico Grosso,
  • Giorgia Mandrile,
  • Andrea Angius,
  • Carlo Arduino,
  • Irene Bagnasco,
  • Elga Fabia Belligni,
  • Giovanni Birolo,
  • Rachele Cantone,
  • Silvia Carestiato,
  • Chiara Davico,
  • Manila Deiana,
  • Eleonora Di Gregorio,
  • Enza Ferrero,
  • Giorgia Gai,
  • Andrea Gazzin,
  • Daniela Francesca Giachino,
  • Chiara Giovenino,
  • Andrea Guala,
  • Antonella Maffè,
  • Andrea Maschio,
  • Matteo Massidda,
  • Stefania Massuras,
  • Alice Moroni,
  • Valeria Giorgia Naretto,
  • Alessandra Pelle,
  • Anna Maria Pengo,
  • Francesco Pintus,
  • Aldamaria Puliti,
  • Vincenzo Rallo,
  • Evelise Riberi,
  • Antonina Rinninella,
  • Serena Rizzo,
  • Federico Rondot,
  • Paola Salmin,
  • Fabio Sirchia,
  • Lorena Sorasio,
  • Benedetto Vitiello,
  • Giulia Zacchetti,
  • Joseph D. Buxbaum,
  • Silvia De Rubeis,
  • Tommaso Pippucci,
  • Marco Tartaglia,
  • Elisa Giorgio,
  • Alfredo Brusco,
  • Giovanni Battista Ferrero

摘要

Exome sequencing (ES) has become a primary tool for diagnosing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), yet the interpretation of genetic variants in large, heterogeneous cohorts presents significant challenges that automated pipelines often fail to resolve. This study showcases the complexities and novel findings derived from a decade-long analysis of 419 Italian NDD patient-parent trios. While ES established a molecular diagnosis in 36.5% of cases (53.8% in syndromic presentations), our investigation moves beyond diagnostic yield to highlight the critical value of manual curation integrated with deep phenotyping. We demonstrate how this rigorous approach uncovers complex disease mechanisms, revealing that variants initially misclassified as missense or stop-gain are, in fact, pathogenic splicing defects confirmed by functional analysis. Furthermore, we resolve the paradox of pathogenic truncating PPM1D variants in control databases by demonstrating their somatic mosaic nature, a crucial insight for population data interpretation. Our work also refines gene-disease correlations by challenging the established role of MID2 in NDDs, providing further evidence for DSCAM as a high-confidence risk gene, and expanding the known phenotypic spectrum of disorders, such as a novel GNAI2-related syndrome lacking expected immune dysfunction. This study underscores that navigating the complexities of large NDD cohorts requires a detailed, expert-driven approach to not only enhance diagnostic yield but also to advance our fundamental understanding of rare disease genetics.