Purpose <p>The role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with first-line systemic therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Its application is not routinely recommended due to inconsistent efficacy and toxicity risks. This study aims to identify specific patients most likely to benefit from TRT in advanced NSCLC.</p> Methods <p>A cohort included 523 patients with metastatic NSCLC from 2019–2024. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.</p> Results <p>The entire cohort median OS was 60 months and median PFS was 22 months. TRT improved both PFS (25 vs. 13 months, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and OS (Not Reached [NR] vs. 46 months, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). In the targeted therapy group, TRT improved PFS (27 vs. 13 months, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 47 months, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). In the chemoimmunotherapy group, TRT improved OS (NR vs. 41 months, <i>P</i> = 0.042) but not PFS (18 vs. 14 months, <i>P</i> = 0.115). Exploratory analysis found TRT increased hematologic toxicity (e.g., ≥ grade 2 lymphopenia: 67.18% vs. 11.33%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and pneumonitis (any grade: 71.31% vs. 17.68%; ≥ grade 2: 17.83% vs. 4.88%, both <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Planning target volume (PTV) as an independent negative predictor for PFS in the TRT group (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p> Conclusion <p>Adding TRT to first-line systemic therapy improves survival in metastatic NSCLC. Treatment strategies should be personalized based on molecular subtype and toxicity risk.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The efficacy and toxicity of TRT on metastatic NSCLC in patients treated with targeted therapy and chemoimmunotherapy

  • Lishan Xue,
  • Jinquan Yao,
  • Qian Xu,
  • Yuxin Geng,
  • Ning Tang,
  • Feifei Teng

摘要

Purpose

The role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with first-line systemic therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Its application is not routinely recommended due to inconsistent efficacy and toxicity risks. This study aims to identify specific patients most likely to benefit from TRT in advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A cohort included 523 patients with metastatic NSCLC from 2019–2024. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

The entire cohort median OS was 60 months and median PFS was 22 months. TRT improved both PFS (25 vs. 13 months, P < 0.001) and OS (Not Reached [NR] vs. 46 months, P < 0.001). In the targeted therapy group, TRT improved PFS (27 vs. 13 months, P < 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 47 months, P < 0.001). In the chemoimmunotherapy group, TRT improved OS (NR vs. 41 months, P = 0.042) but not PFS (18 vs. 14 months, P = 0.115). Exploratory analysis found TRT increased hematologic toxicity (e.g., ≥ grade 2 lymphopenia: 67.18% vs. 11.33%, P < 0.001) and pneumonitis (any grade: 71.31% vs. 17.68%; ≥ grade 2: 17.83% vs. 4.88%, both P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Planning target volume (PTV) as an independent negative predictor for PFS in the TRT group (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Adding TRT to first-line systemic therapy improves survival in metastatic NSCLC. Treatment strategies should be personalized based on molecular subtype and toxicity risk.