Laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants causes significant procedural pain. Although general anaesthesia (GA) is the standard of care, many settings frequently rely on inadequate sedation-analgesia or topical anaesthesia alone, exposing neonates to considerable pain and clinical instability. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of procedural sedation-analgesia during laser photocoagulation for ROP. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for trials investigating sedation-analgesic agents during laser photocoagulation. Primary outcome was analgesic efficacy (pain score reduction, rescue analgesics required). Additional outcomes included adverse effects (e.g., apnea, oxygen requirement). Two reviewers extracted relevant information and assessed risk-of-bias using ROB2 and evidence certainty using GRADE methodology. Of 540 articles screened, four relevant RCTs were identified (n = 265). These RCTs compared varying combinations of agents (oral dextrose vs. no dextrose, fentanyl vs. oral sucrose, fentanyl vs. ketamine, ketamine-propofol vs. GA). Three RCTs evaluating pain-related outcomes (PIPP-R score and intra-procedural crying duration) suggested that the investigated non-general anaesthetic regimens may provide inadequate procedural analgesia (low to very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ketamine-propofol on post-procedure ventilation requirement compared with general anaesthesia. Apnea was the commonest adverse effect (three studies), especially with high-dose fentanyl (30%). Three studies had a low risk-of-bias, while one had some concerns (randomisation, outcome measurement).Conclusion: Overall, the included studies were small RCTs evaluating varying combinations of interventions, precluding concrete conclusions about the superiority of any analgesic regimen during laser photocoagulation. Further high-quality studies are needed to identify safe and effective analgesia for settings where GA is unavailable.Review registration: Prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251070146).<Table Float="No" ID="Taba"> <tgroup cols="2"> <colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" /> <colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2" /> <tbody> <row> <entry nameend="c2" namest="c1"> What is Known: • Laser photocoagulation procedure for retinopathy of prematurity is immensely painful. • Despite general anaesthesia being the standard, most neonates undergo the procedure under inadequate analgesia, particularly in high-burden settings. Optimal analgesic regimen for the laser procedure, in settings where general anaesthesia is unavailable, is unknown. </entry> </row> <row> <entry nameend="c2" namest="c1"> What is New: • This systematic review of trials investigating analgesic agents for laser procedure for ROP found four RCTs with significant heterogeneity in intervention agents. • Low- to very low-certainty evidence suggests that none of the evaluated sedo-analgesic regimens consistently achieved optimal analgesia, and most infants continued to experience moderate-to-severe procedural pain. </entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </Table>

Efficacy and safety of procedural sedation-analgesia during laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review

期刊论文
发表日期：

2026年7月11日

查看全文

Satya Prakash,
Deena Thomas,
Shamnad Madathil,
Deepika Kainth

摘要

Laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants causes significant procedural pain. Although general anaesthesia (GA) is the standard of care, many settings frequently rely on inadequate sedation-analgesia or topical anaesthesia alone, exposing neonates to considerable pain and clinical instability. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of procedural sedation-analgesia during laser photocoagulation for ROP. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for trials investigating sedation-analgesic agents during laser photocoagulation. Primary outcome was analgesic efficacy (pain score reduction, rescue analgesics required). Additional outcomes included adverse effects (e.g., apnea, oxygen requirement). Two reviewers extracted relevant information and assessed risk-of-bias using ROB2 and evidence certainty using GRADE methodology. Of 540 articles screened, four relevant RCTs were identified (n = 265). These RCTs compared varying combinations of agents (oral dextrose vs. no dextrose, fentanyl vs. oral sucrose, fentanyl vs. ketamine, ketamine-propofol vs. GA). Three RCTs evaluating pain-related outcomes (PIPP-R score and intra-procedural crying duration) suggested that the investigated non-general anaesthetic regimens may provide inadequate procedural analgesia (low to very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ketamine-propofol on post-procedure ventilation requirement compared with general anaesthesia. Apnea was the commonest adverse effect (three studies), especially with high-dose fentanyl (30%). Three studies had a low risk-of-bias, while one had some concerns (randomisation, outcome measurement).

Conclusion: Overall, the included studies were small RCTs evaluating varying combinations of interventions, precluding concrete conclusions about the superiority of any analgesic regimen during laser photocoagulation. Further high-quality studies are needed to identify safe and effective analgesia for settings where GA is unavailable.

Review registration: Prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251070146).

What is Known:

• Laser photocoagulation procedure for retinopathy of prematurity is immensely painful.

• Despite general anaesthesia being the standard, most neonates undergo the procedure under inadequate analgesia, particularly in high-burden settings. Optimal analgesic regimen for the laser procedure, in settings where general anaesthesia is unavailable, is unknown.

What is New:

• This systematic review of trials investigating analgesic agents for laser procedure for ROP found four RCTs with significant heterogeneity in intervention agents.

• Low- to very low-certainty evidence suggests that none of the evaluated sedo-analgesic regimens consistently achieved optimal analgesia, and most infants continued to experience moderate-to-severe procedural pain.