Impact of the BRUE (Brief Resolved Unexplained event) definition on hospital clinical practice and recurrence: a quasi-experimental study in infants
摘要
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) changed the definition ALTE to BRUE in its 2016 guideline, which provides a precise definition and establishes criteria for severity, need for hospitalization, and complementary tests. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the AAP-guideline implementation reduced complementary tests, hospital stay, and to analyze recurrence rates and risk factors for recurrence. A quasi-experimental study was conducted on patients admitted for ALTE/BRUE between January 2015 and December 2021, before and after the publication of the AAP-guideline. A total of 277 patients admitted for BRUE were included, 84 (30.3%) before the AAP guideline and 193 (69.7%) after. Following the change in definition, a decrease in average hospital stay was observed (3 vs. 2 days, p = 0.03). There were fewer pHmetry tests (28.5% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.03), metabolic tests (13% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.01), and reduced home monitoring (17.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.04). We found no differences in income among critical units (0% vs 2.6% p = 0.32). Patients with underlying conditions has a higher risk of recurrence (OR 4.43 (1.14–2.17; p = 0.04)).
Conclusions:The implementation of the AAP-guideline in 2016 represents a significant change in the management of this condition, with shorter average hospital stays, fewer supplementary tests, and reduced need for home monitoring, all without compromising patient safety. The number of admissions to critical care units has remained stable, and there has been no increase in recurrences. Patients with underlying conditions are at higher risk of recurrence and constitute a vulnerable group that should be carefully evaluated.