Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The lateral pelvic cavity is an anatomically tricky site to access using a linear approach; therefore, robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) may be superior over existing laparoscopic procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted LLND (R-LLND) versus laparoscopic LLND (L-LLND) for locally advanced low rectal cancer and explore the potential advantages of robot-assisted surgery.</p> Methods <p>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent minimally invasive total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LLND for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided into L-LLND and R-LLND groups. The short- and long-term outcomes of the procedures were compared.</p> Results <p>There were 41 patients in the L-LLND group and 21 in the R-LLND group. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the R-LLND group (49% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.029), especially urinary retention (29% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.046). The median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the R-LLND group (22 vs. 15 days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates in the L-LLND and R-LLND groups were 75.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.9–85.9) and 65.7% (95% CI: 30.7–86.1), respectively. No significant differences were observed in long-term survival outcomes.</p> Conclusion <p>Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent TME plus R-LLND had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to those who underwent TME plus L-LLND. The long-term outcomes were comparable, and no oncological concerns associated with R-LLND were observed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月7日

查看全文
  • Daichi Kitaguchi,
  • Tsuyoshi Enomoto,
  • Kinji Furuya,
  • Shuntaro Tsukamoto,
  • Tatsuya Oda

摘要

Purpose

The lateral pelvic cavity is an anatomically tricky site to access using a linear approach; therefore, robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) may be superior over existing laparoscopic procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted LLND (R-LLND) versus laparoscopic LLND (L-LLND) for locally advanced low rectal cancer and explore the potential advantages of robot-assisted surgery.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent minimally invasive total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LLND for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided into L-LLND and R-LLND groups. The short- and long-term outcomes of the procedures were compared.

Results

There were 41 patients in the L-LLND group and 21 in the R-LLND group. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the R-LLND group (49% vs. 19%, p = 0.029), especially urinary retention (29% vs. 5%, p = 0.046). The median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the R-LLND group (22 vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates in the L-LLND and R-LLND groups were 75.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.9–85.9) and 65.7% (95% CI: 30.7–86.1), respectively. No significant differences were observed in long-term survival outcomes.

Conclusion

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent TME plus R-LLND had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to those who underwent TME plus L-LLND. The long-term outcomes were comparable, and no oncological concerns associated with R-LLND were observed.