错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic approaches in short- and long-term outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study

  • Mitsutoshi Ishii,
  • Tetsuro Tominaga,
  • Takashi Nonaka,
  • Yuma Takamura,
  • Kaido Oishi,
  • Shintaro Hashimoto,
  • Toshio Shiraishi,
  • Keisuke Noda,
  • Rika Ono,
  • Makoto Hisanaga,
  • Hiroaki Takeshita,
  • Hidetoshi Fukuoka,
  • Shosaburo Oyama,
  • Terumitsu Sawai,
  • Keitaro Matsumoto

摘要

Background

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is a challenging surgical technique with complex anatomy and narrow pelvic manipulation. The outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for LPND are still unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 169 consecutive patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery with LPND between 2016 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether LPND was performed by robotic surgery (R group, n = 40) or laparoscopic surgery (L group, n = 129). Clinicopathological feature and outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

Frequency of surgery with combined resection of adjacent structures (5.0% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.023), frequency of patients with distant metastasis (5.0% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.028), and estimated blood loss from bilateral LPND (74 mL vs. 132 mL, p = 0.013) were all lower in the R group than in the L group. Type of surgical approach did not correlate with postoperative complications. Median follow-up was 31.0 months (range, 1.0–69.0 months). No patients in the R group experienced local recurrence, compared to 4.6% in the L group. Multivariate analysis revealed laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio 3.687, 95% confidence interval 1.505–6.033; p = 0.004) as an independent predictor of poor relapse-free survival.

Conclusions

Robotic surgery for LPND appears to have good prognostic value in some, but not all, oncologic cases. However, large prospective studies are desirable to validate these findings.