错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 2024 update on risk factors

  • Angelo Iossa,
  • Lorenzo Martini,
  • Francesco De Angelis,
  • Alessandra Micalizzi,
  • Brad Michael Watkins,
  • Gianfranco Silecchia,
  • Giuseppe Cavallaro

摘要

Purpose

Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy remain a deadly complication significantly affecting outcomes and medical costs. The aim of the present review is to provide an updated decalogue on leak prevention.

Methods

Risk factors of leakage after LSG were examined based on an extensive review of literature (in period time 2016–2024) and summary of evidence was provided using Oxford levels of evidence scale.

Results

Pathogenesis of leakage after LSG still remain related to ischemic and mechanical factors and, therefore, no new evidence has been reported. Conversely, some technical aspect of the procedure has changed: bougie size, antrum resection, staple line reinforcement, and intraoperative leak testing.

Conclusions

Bougie size 36 F is effective and safe achieving similar leakage rate compared to larger bougie sizes (EL:2) 2024 UPDATE; There is no significant difference in the leak rate between restrictive (< 6 cm) and conservative (6 cm) antrum resection (EL: 1) 2024 UPDATE; Surgical experience and case volume affect the leak rate more consistently than every kind of SLR (EL: 2) 2024 UPDATE; Intraoperative leak test after LSG represents a decision based on surgeon preference in absence of standardization (endoscopy, bubble test, methylene blue, indocyanine green.) and strong detection/prevention rate (EL: 3) 2024 UPDATE.