错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Surgical management of rectal cancer with synchronous treatment of prostate cancer

  • Raphaëlle Brière,
  • André-Guy Martin,
  • François Letarte,
  • François Rouleau Fournier,
  • Philippe Bouchard,
  • Sébastien Drolet

摘要

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of synchronous treatments for rectal (RC) and prostate (PC) cancers.

Methods

Single-center retrospective study (2007–2021) of patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) for RC with synchronous PC treatment. The endpoints were 30-day postoperative severe complications, R0 resection rates, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS).

Results

Among the 16 patients, 15 (93.7%) received neoadjuvant pelvic RT (40–50.4 Gray) followed by either transperineal high dose rate prostate brachytherapy (62.5%), prostate external RT boost (25.0%), or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone (6.3%). One (6.3%) patient received neoadjuvant rectal brachytherapy and ADT. Pelvic RT was combined with chemotherapy in 87.5% of cases. TME was performed in all patients with low anterior resection (87.5%) or abdominoperineal resection (12.5%), primarily using minimally invasive surgery (87.5%). The R0 resection rate was 93.8%. Six (37.5%) patients experienced 30-day Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, including one (7.1%) anastomotic leak. After a median follow-up of 39.0 months, 63.6% of diverting ileostomies were reversed. Three-year DFS from RC was 71.4% (CI 40.2–88.3) and 3-year OS was 84.4% (CI 95% 50.4–95.9). No PC recurrence or death occurred.

Conclusions

Synchronous management of RC and PC with pelvic RT followed by curative prostate RT doses and TME showed acceptable morbidity and oncologic results. Prostate brachytherapy, the most commonly used treatment modality, allowed avoidance of prostatectomy and additional external RT to the rectum. PC should not limit the curative intent of RC, as all recurrences were from rectal origin.