Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Controlled breathing is a hemodynamic maneuver known to influence both baroreflex and chemoreflex sensitivity. This study investigated the impact of respiratory-driven oscillations on the relationship between cerebral autoregulation and autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity.</p> Methods <p>Sixty-one volunteers (median age: 23&#xa0;years) underwent noninvasive measurements of arterial blood pressure (ABP), cerebral blood velocity (CBv), end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>), and respiratory rate during spontaneous breathing and during three 5-min sessions of controlled breathing at 6, 10, and 15&#xa0;bpm. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed using transfer function analysis by calculating phase shift (PS) and gain between ABP and CBv in the very low frequency (VLF; 0.02–0.07&#xa0;Hz) and breathing frequency (BF; [0.1, 0.17, 0.25] ± 0.02&#xa0;Hz) ranges. ANS activity was assessed using baroreflex sensitivity (xBRS), heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in time and frequency domains, and entropy-based parameters. Cardiovascular coupling was assessed using the joint symbolic dynamics of beat-to-beat pulse interval and systolic blood pressure.</p> Results <p>Increasing respiratory rate led to decreased EtCO<sub>2</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), diminished cardiovascular coupling (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and reduced systemic ABP control,&#xa0;as indicated by lower normalized low-frequency HRV and xBRS (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for EtCO<sub>2</sub> and respiratory rate, showed that PS at VLF and BF was modulated by&#xa0;ANS metrics, whereas gain was mainly affected by respiratory parameters, with a nonsignificant contribution from ANS.</p> Conclusions <p>Higher respiratory rates reduced cardiovascular coupling, diminished ANS activity, and modified its interaction with cerebral autoregulation. Respiratory parameters should be considered when assessing ANS–cerebral autoregulation relationship.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Relationship between the autonomic nervous system and cerebral autoregulation during controlled breathing

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月18日

查看全文
  • Agnieszka Uryga,
  • Monika Najdek,
  • Piotr Urbański,
  • Magdalena Kasprowicz,
  • Teodor Buchner

摘要

Introduction

Controlled breathing is a hemodynamic maneuver known to influence both baroreflex and chemoreflex sensitivity. This study investigated the impact of respiratory-driven oscillations on the relationship between cerebral autoregulation and autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity.

Methods

Sixty-one volunteers (median age: 23 years) underwent noninvasive measurements of arterial blood pressure (ABP), cerebral blood velocity (CBv), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), and respiratory rate during spontaneous breathing and during three 5-min sessions of controlled breathing at 6, 10, and 15 bpm. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed using transfer function analysis by calculating phase shift (PS) and gain between ABP and CBv in the very low frequency (VLF; 0.02–0.07 Hz) and breathing frequency (BF; [0.1, 0.17, 0.25] ± 0.02 Hz) ranges. ANS activity was assessed using baroreflex sensitivity (xBRS), heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in time and frequency domains, and entropy-based parameters. Cardiovascular coupling was assessed using the joint symbolic dynamics of beat-to-beat pulse interval and systolic blood pressure.

Results

Increasing respiratory rate led to decreased EtCO2 (p < 0.001), diminished cardiovascular coupling (p < 0.01), and reduced systemic ABP control, as indicated by lower normalized low-frequency HRV and xBRS (both p < 0.001). A linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for EtCO2 and respiratory rate, showed that PS at VLF and BF was modulated by ANS metrics, whereas gain was mainly affected by respiratory parameters, with a nonsignificant contribution from ANS.

Conclusions

Higher respiratory rates reduced cardiovascular coupling, diminished ANS activity, and modified its interaction with cerebral autoregulation. Respiratory parameters should be considered when assessing ANS–cerebral autoregulation relationship.