<p>The element-free Galerkin method (EFGM), a meshless approach, was applied to the stress analysis of adhesively bonded single-lap joints and compared with finite element method (FEM) and analytical solutions. EFGM successfully reproduced the general stress distributions, including three-dimensional effects such as anticlastic bending, free-corner stresses, and out-of-plane components that are not captured by classical analytical models. Error analysis revealed that FEM consistently provided closer agreement with analytical solutions, while EFGM exhibited larger quantitative discrepancies, particularly in σ<sub>y</sub> and τ<sub>yz</sub>. The novelty of this work lies in applying EFGM to the three-dimensional stress analysis of adhesively bonded joints, with a systematic comparison against FEM and analytical solutions, including explicit error analysis and evaluation of out-of-plane stress components. These results demonstrate that, although less accurate quantitatively, EFGM provides valuable qualitative insight and remains attractive for problems involving complex geometries or large deformations where mesh generation for FEM is difficult.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The stress analysis in the adhesively bonded joint by using meshless method

  • Goudarz Ghanizadeh Hesar,
  • Murat Demir Aydin

摘要

The element-free Galerkin method (EFGM), a meshless approach, was applied to the stress analysis of adhesively bonded single-lap joints and compared with finite element method (FEM) and analytical solutions. EFGM successfully reproduced the general stress distributions, including three-dimensional effects such as anticlastic bending, free-corner stresses, and out-of-plane components that are not captured by classical analytical models. Error analysis revealed that FEM consistently provided closer agreement with analytical solutions, while EFGM exhibited larger quantitative discrepancies, particularly in σy and τyz. The novelty of this work lies in applying EFGM to the three-dimensional stress analysis of adhesively bonded joints, with a systematic comparison against FEM and analytical solutions, including explicit error analysis and evaluation of out-of-plane stress components. These results demonstrate that, although less accurate quantitatively, EFGM provides valuable qualitative insight and remains attractive for problems involving complex geometries or large deformations where mesh generation for FEM is difficult.

Graphical abstract