Scholarlink

<p>To investigate the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock, a series of uniaxial compression and CT scanning tests of stratified limestone and sandstone at different bedding plane dip angles (<i>α</i>) were conducted. The experimental results showed that with the increasing <i>α</i>, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), peak strain (<i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub>), Poisson’s ratio (<i>μ</i>) of stratified limestone and sandstone all first decreased and then increased, elastic modulus (<i>E</i>) of stratified limestone continuously increased, <i>E</i> of stratified sandstone first decreased and then increased. At different <i>α</i>, UCS and <i>E</i> of stratified limestone were larger than that of stratified sandstone, <i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub> and <i>μ</i> of stratified limestone were smaller than that of stratified sandstone. For stratified limestone, anisotropy coefficient of <i>μ</i> was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of <i>E</i> was the smallest. For stratified sandstone, anisotropy coefficient of <i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub> was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of <i>E</i> was the smallest. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone and sandstone was approaching for UCS. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was larger than stratified sandstone for <i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub> and <i>μ</i>. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was smaller than stratified sandstone for <i>E</i>. The failure category of stratified limestone and sandstone at different <i>α</i> was quite different. Due to differences in failure mode, the morphology and distribution characteristics of micro-cracks along the sample height showed a significant difference. With the increasing <i>α</i>, volume fraction (VF) and the maximum area fraction (AF) first decreased and then increased for stratified limestone, and showed no obvious change trend for stratified sandstone. At <i>α</i> = 0º, 30º, 90º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified limestone were significantly larger than that of stratified sandstone. At <i>α</i> = 60º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified sandstone were larger than that of stratified limestone.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effects of bedding plane dip angle and lithology on the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock under uniaxial compression test

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月6日

查看全文
  • Yaoyao Meng,
  • Hao Chen,
  • Hongwen Jing,
  • Qian Yin,
  • Xiaowei Liu,
  • Ke Ding

摘要

To investigate the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock, a series of uniaxial compression and CT scanning tests of stratified limestone and sandstone at different bedding plane dip angles (α) were conducted. The experimental results showed that with the increasing α, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), peak strain (ε1p), Poisson’s ratio (μ) of stratified limestone and sandstone all first decreased and then increased, elastic modulus (E) of stratified limestone continuously increased, E of stratified sandstone first decreased and then increased. At different α, UCS and E of stratified limestone were larger than that of stratified sandstone, ε1p and μ of stratified limestone were smaller than that of stratified sandstone. For stratified limestone, anisotropy coefficient of μ was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of E was the smallest. For stratified sandstone, anisotropy coefficient of ε1p was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of E was the smallest. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone and sandstone was approaching for UCS. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was larger than stratified sandstone for ε1p and μ. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was smaller than stratified sandstone for E. The failure category of stratified limestone and sandstone at different α was quite different. Due to differences in failure mode, the morphology and distribution characteristics of micro-cracks along the sample height showed a significant difference. With the increasing α, volume fraction (VF) and the maximum area fraction (AF) first decreased and then increased for stratified limestone, and showed no obvious change trend for stratified sandstone. At α = 0º, 30º, 90º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified limestone were significantly larger than that of stratified sandstone. At α = 60º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified sandstone were larger than that of stratified limestone.