Scholarlink

Objective <p>To explore the effect of PuM&#xa0;and combined PuM/ANT DBS on sleep in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively collected data from DRE patients with PuM-DBS or combined PuM/ANT-DBS and at least one night of EEG recording. Visual scoring of the whole night and quantitative power spectrum analysis on the first and last NREM sleep cycles were performed. We compared sleep characteristics of intra- and inter-patients with PuM-DBS and combined PuM/ANT-DBS.</p> Results <p>Five nights were analyzed across three patients. Patient 1 underwent three sequential nights with different DBS settings: ANT + /PuM + , ANT + /PuM-, and ANT + /PuM + . ANT-DBS, either alone or in combination, was associated with disrupted sleep architecture, particularly in the latter part of the night. Visual staging showed no clear differences over the nights. Quantitative analysis however showed a worst sleep architecture in the last NREM cycle, as disclosed by a lower normalized delta power, in the second night (ANT + /PuM-) compared with the first and third nights (ANT + /PuM +). In patients with PuM-DBS alone, in cyclic or continuous stimulation modalities, sleep structure appeared preserved, with normal sleep efficiency and a normalized delta power higher than that of patient one.</p> Significance <p>PuM-DBS, compared to ANT-DBS, appeared not to disrupt sleep architecture.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effects of pulvinar and combined pulvinar/anterior thalamic deep-brain stimulation on sleep: preliminary results

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月23日

查看全文
  • Pietro Mattioli,
  • Asli Akyol Gurses,
  • Sara Simula,
  • Romain Carron,
  • Fabrice Bartolomei,
  • Isabelle Lambert,
  • Francesca Pizzo

摘要

Objective

To explore the effect of PuM and combined PuM/ANT DBS on sleep in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from DRE patients with PuM-DBS or combined PuM/ANT-DBS and at least one night of EEG recording. Visual scoring of the whole night and quantitative power spectrum analysis on the first and last NREM sleep cycles were performed. We compared sleep characteristics of intra- and inter-patients with PuM-DBS and combined PuM/ANT-DBS.

Results

Five nights were analyzed across three patients. Patient 1 underwent three sequential nights with different DBS settings: ANT + /PuM + , ANT + /PuM-, and ANT + /PuM + . ANT-DBS, either alone or in combination, was associated with disrupted sleep architecture, particularly in the latter part of the night. Visual staging showed no clear differences over the nights. Quantitative analysis however showed a worst sleep architecture in the last NREM cycle, as disclosed by a lower normalized delta power, in the second night (ANT + /PuM-) compared with the first and third nights (ANT + /PuM +). In patients with PuM-DBS alone, in cyclic or continuous stimulation modalities, sleep structure appeared preserved, with normal sleep efficiency and a normalized delta power higher than that of patient one.

Significance

PuM-DBS, compared to ANT-DBS, appeared not to disrupt sleep architecture.