Introduction <p>Late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS, onset &gt; 50&#xa0;years) is increasingly recognized and may differ from adult-onset MS (AOMS).</p> Objectives <p>To compare clinical, motor, and cognitive features of LOMS vs. AOMS, and explore the influence of fatigue and depression on cognitive impairment.</p> Methods <p>In this case–control study, 41 LOMS patients and 82 disease duration- and sex-matched AOMS patients underwent neurological evaluation (including recording of vascular risk factors), neuropsychological evaluations (including fatigue and depression), and motor function assessment (9-Hole Peg and Timed 25-Foot Walk tests). Group differences were FDR-corrected. Logistic regressions tested associations and interactions of fatigue and depression with cognitive impairment. A <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p> Results <p>Compared to AOMS, LOMS patients more frequently presented with motor onset and progressive phenotypes, had higher EDSS, higher prevalence of patients with EDSS ≥ 4, and were less often treated (pFDR ≤ 0.011). No differences emerged in vascular risk factor prevalence and motor task performance. Compared to AOMS, LOMS showed more frequent cognitive impairment (36% vs 17%), with worse performance in attention, verbal fluency, and global cognition (pFDR ≤ 0.049). LOMS patients were also more frequently fatigued (63% vs 32%) and had higher fatigue severity scores (pFDR ≤ 0.033). Depression did not differ between groups. Fatigue was associated with cognitive impairment only in LOMS (OR = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.05–1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.002), with a significant group × fatigue interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.014), independent of age and disability. No association was found between depression and cognitive impairment.</p> Conclusions <p>LOMS showed a worse clinical and cognitive profile than AOMS, with fatigue playing a significant role in cognitive vulnerability.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Clinical, functional and cognitive features of late-onset multiple sclerosis

  • Nicolò Tedone,
  • Paolo Preziosa,
  • Alessandro Meani,
  • Damiano Mistri,
  • Federica Esposito,
  • Maria A. Rocca,
  • Massimo Filippi

摘要

Introduction

Late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS, onset > 50 years) is increasingly recognized and may differ from adult-onset MS (AOMS).

Objectives

To compare clinical, motor, and cognitive features of LOMS vs. AOMS, and explore the influence of fatigue and depression on cognitive impairment.

Methods

In this case–control study, 41 LOMS patients and 82 disease duration- and sex-matched AOMS patients underwent neurological evaluation (including recording of vascular risk factors), neuropsychological evaluations (including fatigue and depression), and motor function assessment (9-Hole Peg and Timed 25-Foot Walk tests). Group differences were FDR-corrected. Logistic regressions tested associations and interactions of fatigue and depression with cognitive impairment. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared to AOMS, LOMS patients more frequently presented with motor onset and progressive phenotypes, had higher EDSS, higher prevalence of patients with EDSS ≥ 4, and were less often treated (pFDR ≤ 0.011). No differences emerged in vascular risk factor prevalence and motor task performance. Compared to AOMS, LOMS showed more frequent cognitive impairment (36% vs 17%), with worse performance in attention, verbal fluency, and global cognition (pFDR ≤ 0.049). LOMS patients were also more frequently fatigued (63% vs 32%) and had higher fatigue severity scores (pFDR ≤ 0.033). Depression did not differ between groups. Fatigue was associated with cognitive impairment only in LOMS (OR = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.05–1.22, p = 0.002), with a significant group × fatigue interaction (p = 0.014), independent of age and disability. No association was found between depression and cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

LOMS showed a worse clinical and cognitive profile than AOMS, with fatigue playing a significant role in cognitive vulnerability.