Background <p>Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder characterized by painful discomfort, an urge to move the legs and circadian and sleep–wake disturbances. The pathophysiology is complex and not fully understood, with inhibitory dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons or increased sympathetic activity being discussed. Aim of this study was to shed light on the association between dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system and RLS.</p> Methods <p>6 RLS patients diagnosed according to consensus criteria were compared with 9 gender- and age-matched healthy controls. Patients were clinically characterized using the International RLS Severity Scale (IRLS), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the RLS Quality of Life Questionnaire (RLSQoL). Multi-unit sympathetic microneurography was performed in the peroneal nerve. Cardiovascular parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were assessed at rest and during baroreflex stimulation using lower body negative pressure (LBNP).</p> Results <p>MSNA at rest was higher in RLS patients (burst frequency [BF]: 42.4 ± 1.7 bursts/min; burst incidence [BI]: 64.0 ± 2.7 bursts/100 heartbeats) compared to controls (BF: 29.5 ± 1.4 bursts/min, F = 15.332, p = 0.002; BI: 42.9 ± 3.2 bursts/100 heartbeats, F = 21.156, p = 0.001). After baroreflex stimulation, RLS patients had increased absolute values of MSNA (BF: F = 15.096; p = 0.002; BI: F = 21.115; p &lt; 0.001) compared to controls. In RLS patients, BF and BI dropped below baseline values, while in healthy controls BF and BI remained above baseline. After normalization of BF and BI data, the MSNA outflow during baroreflex stimulation was lower in RLS patients than those of healthy controls (BF: F = 4.574; p = 0.002, BI: F = 6.259; p &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>The current study is the first to directly demonstrate increased sympathetic neuronal activity in RLS. Possible explanations include a dysfunction in inhibitory projections to sympathetic neurons in the intermediate lateral column of the spinal cord or a disease-unspecific effect of sleep deprivation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

RLS shows increased resting state sympathetic activity and decreased sympathetic response capability

  • Christoph Best,
  • Ana Luiza C. Sayegh,
  • Annette Janzen,
  • Wolfgang H. Oertel,
  • Heidrun H. Krämer

摘要

Background

Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder characterized by painful discomfort, an urge to move the legs and circadian and sleep–wake disturbances. The pathophysiology is complex and not fully understood, with inhibitory dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons or increased sympathetic activity being discussed. Aim of this study was to shed light on the association between dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system and RLS.

Methods

6 RLS patients diagnosed according to consensus criteria were compared with 9 gender- and age-matched healthy controls. Patients were clinically characterized using the International RLS Severity Scale (IRLS), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the RLS Quality of Life Questionnaire (RLSQoL). Multi-unit sympathetic microneurography was performed in the peroneal nerve. Cardiovascular parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were assessed at rest and during baroreflex stimulation using lower body negative pressure (LBNP).

Results

MSNA at rest was higher in RLS patients (burst frequency [BF]: 42.4 ± 1.7 bursts/min; burst incidence [BI]: 64.0 ± 2.7 bursts/100 heartbeats) compared to controls (BF: 29.5 ± 1.4 bursts/min, F = 15.332, p = 0.002; BI: 42.9 ± 3.2 bursts/100 heartbeats, F = 21.156, p = 0.001). After baroreflex stimulation, RLS patients had increased absolute values of MSNA (BF: F = 15.096; p = 0.002; BI: F = 21.115; p < 0.001) compared to controls. In RLS patients, BF and BI dropped below baseline values, while in healthy controls BF and BI remained above baseline. After normalization of BF and BI data, the MSNA outflow during baroreflex stimulation was lower in RLS patients than those of healthy controls (BF: F = 4.574; p = 0.002, BI: F = 6.259; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The current study is the first to directly demonstrate increased sympathetic neuronal activity in RLS. Possible explanations include a dysfunction in inhibitory projections to sympathetic neurons in the intermediate lateral column of the spinal cord or a disease-unspecific effect of sleep deprivation.