Scholarlink

Purpose <p>This study aimed to characterize evolving causes and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) revision surgeries in the post-2012 era, a period marked by improved device reliability and changing patient expectations.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively reviewed 1,449 CI procedures performed at a tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2024, identifying 48 revision surgeries. Cases were categorized by implantation site (in-house vs. referral) and classified by revision indication. Device survival was evaluated with Kaplan–Meier and competing risks analyses. Auditory outcomes and electrode positioning were assessed before and after revision.</p> Results <p>The in-house revision rate was 1.9%, with a 7-year cumulative device survival of 96.1%. Functional performance concerns (n = 20) emerged as the leading cause of revision, exceeding infection/flap problems (n = 19) and device failure (n = 6). Referral patients more often underwent elective reimplantation for performance optimization, frequently converting from lateral wall to modiolar-hugging arrays. These revisions consistently achieved superior modiolar proximity and significant gains in speech perception, with postoperative imaging confirming successful reinsertion trajectories despite fibrous tracts. Infection remained the predominant early complication, while functional revisions increased gradually over time.</p> Conclusion <p>Revision cochlear implantation in the modern era reflects both reduced device failures and the rise of patient-driven revisions for functional optimization. Strategic electrode selection and pursuit of bilateral symmetry can yield meaningful auditory improvements. These findings underscore the evolving role of revision surgery in enhancing CI outcomes, highlighting the importance of individualized decision-making in contemporary practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evolving trends in cochlear implant reimplantation: An analysis of causes and outcomes at a tertiary referral cohort

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月16日

查看全文
  • Dong Woo Nam,
  • Yehree Kim,
  • Ye Jun Chun,
  • Hye Rim Park,
  • Jin Hee Han,
  • Ji-Yeon Yang,
  • Min Young Kim,
  • Ngoc-Trinh Tran,
  • Jae Won Yun,
  • Kenneth Lee,
  • Bong Jik Kim,
  • Byung Yoon Choi

摘要

Purpose

This study aimed to characterize evolving causes and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) revision surgeries in the post-2012 era, a period marked by improved device reliability and changing patient expectations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1,449 CI procedures performed at a tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2024, identifying 48 revision surgeries. Cases were categorized by implantation site (in-house vs. referral) and classified by revision indication. Device survival was evaluated with Kaplan–Meier and competing risks analyses. Auditory outcomes and electrode positioning were assessed before and after revision.

Results

The in-house revision rate was 1.9%, with a 7-year cumulative device survival of 96.1%. Functional performance concerns (n = 20) emerged as the leading cause of revision, exceeding infection/flap problems (n = 19) and device failure (n = 6). Referral patients more often underwent elective reimplantation for performance optimization, frequently converting from lateral wall to modiolar-hugging arrays. These revisions consistently achieved superior modiolar proximity and significant gains in speech perception, with postoperative imaging confirming successful reinsertion trajectories despite fibrous tracts. Infection remained the predominant early complication, while functional revisions increased gradually over time.

Conclusion

Revision cochlear implantation in the modern era reflects both reduced device failures and the rise of patient-driven revisions for functional optimization. Strategic electrode selection and pursuit of bilateral symmetry can yield meaningful auditory improvements. These findings underscore the evolving role of revision surgery in enhancing CI outcomes, highlighting the importance of individualized decision-making in contemporary practice.