Wide exposure VS. stab surgical incisions in necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck: a retrospective analysis of 22 cases

Necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck is a rare, rapidly progressing bacterial infection with high mortality. Traditional surgical management involves wide exposure incisions, but minimally invasive stab incisions have emerged as a potential alternative. This study aimed to compare outcomes between wide exposure and stab surgical incisions in the management of head and neck necrotizing fasciitis.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients treated for necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck between January 2006 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: wide exposure incisions (N = 15) and stab surgical incisions (N = 7). Data on mortality, hospital stay, hypertrophic scarring, neck contractures, and tracheostomy tube dependence were collected.

The overall mortality rate was 9.1%, with 6.7% in the wide exposure group and 14.3% in the stab surgical incision group (p > 0.05). Hypertrophic scarring occurred in 59.1% of patients, all of whom underwent wide exposure incisions. Neck contractures were observed in 9.1% of cases, also in the wide exposure group. Tracheostomy was performed in 63.6% of patients, with successful decannulation achieved in 91.7%. The median hospital stay was longer in the stab surgical incision group (p < 0.05), partly due to the need for revision surgeries.

Wide exposure incisions remain the standard treatment for necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck due to their effectiveness in managing extensive tissue necrosis. However, stab surgical incisions offer the advantage of reduced morbidity and functional impairment. These benefits are offset by a slightly higher mortality rate and the potential need for additional interventions. Stab incisions may be a viable option in carefully selected patients, particularly those without extensive comorbidities or advanced disease.