Scholarlink

Introduction <p>This study assessed the bone cuts accuracy of a robotic-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that was recently upgraded.</p> Materials and methods <p>Three orthopaedic surgeons planned and executed TKA on 24 sawbones. Bone cut accuracy was assessed using CT scans, comparing the planning and the actual bone cuts in all six degrees-of-freedom.</p> Results <p>The root-mean-square (RMS) values were below 2&#xa0;mm or 2° for all error types, except for the medio-lateral position (2.4&#xa0;mm) and internal-external rotation (2.3°) of the left tibias. The maximal amplitude of the 288 errors (6 degrees-of-freedom * 2 bones * 24 knees) was observed in tibial external rotation (3.2°). Most error types reported a bias, with limited variations among knees.</p> Conclusions <p>The errors were in the same range as those of the prior version of the system, suggesting that the improvements brought by the system upgrade were not obtained at the expense of accuracy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The usability of robotic-assisted systems for total knee arthroplasty can be improved without hindering the accuracy of the bone cuts

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月27日

查看全文
  • Killian Cosendey,
  • Julien Stanovici,
  • Jaad Mahlouly,
  • Patrick Omoumi,
  • Brigitte M. Jolles,
  • Julien Favre

摘要

Introduction

This study assessed the bone cuts accuracy of a robotic-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that was recently upgraded.

Materials and methods

Three orthopaedic surgeons planned and executed TKA on 24 sawbones. Bone cut accuracy was assessed using CT scans, comparing the planning and the actual bone cuts in all six degrees-of-freedom.

Results

The root-mean-square (RMS) values were below 2 mm or 2° for all error types, except for the medio-lateral position (2.4 mm) and internal-external rotation (2.3°) of the left tibias. The maximal amplitude of the 288 errors (6 degrees-of-freedom * 2 bones * 24 knees) was observed in tibial external rotation (3.2°). Most error types reported a bias, with limited variations among knees.

Conclusions

The errors were in the same range as those of the prior version of the system, suggesting that the improvements brought by the system upgrade were not obtained at the expense of accuracy.