Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a severe complication after colorectal surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality. Powered circular staplers may influence anastomotic healing through standardised compression and power distribution. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of powered versus manual circular staplers for transanal anastomoses.</p> Method <p>This retrospective single-centre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal resection with transanal circular anastomosis between January 2022 and June 2025. Primary endpoint was the incidence of AL according to stapler type. To ensure comparability between groups, propensity score matching was performed.</p> Results <p>Among 333 patients, powered staplers were used in 69.1% and manual staplers in 30.9%. The overall AL rate was 15.0%. AL was significantly associated with higher BMI (28.1 vs. 26.6 kg/m²; p = .021), ASA ≥ 3 (64.0 vs. 46.0%; p = .019), diabetes mellitus (24.0 vs. 8.1%; p .001), open (34.0 vs. 19.1%) or converted surgeries (14.0 vs. 4.9%; p = .004) and greater intraoperative fluid administration (2548.1 vs. 2188.8 ml; p = .015). Most patients (72.1%) followed enhanced recovery concepts (FAST TRACK) with trend toward lower adherence in the AL cohort (n.s.).&#xa0; After propensity score matching, AL occurred in 9.7% following powered circular stapling and 11.8% following manual circular stapling (n.s.).</p> Conclusion <p>In this cohort, powered stapling devices were not associated with lower anastomotic leakage rates compared with manual staplers for transanal circular anastomosis in patients managed under modern minimally invasive and FAST TRACK concepts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Impact of powered circular stapling devices on anastomotic leakage rates in colorectal surgery

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月8日

查看全文
  • Catherine Kollmann,
  • Theresa Eckart,
  • Beata Kusnezov,
  • Lars Kollmann,
  • Matthias Kelm,
  • Christoph-Thomas Germer,
  • Johan Friso Lock,
  • Sven Flemming

摘要

Introduction

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a severe complication after colorectal surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality. Powered circular staplers may influence anastomotic healing through standardised compression and power distribution. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of powered versus manual circular staplers for transanal anastomoses.

Method

This retrospective single-centre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal resection with transanal circular anastomosis between January 2022 and June 2025. Primary endpoint was the incidence of AL according to stapler type. To ensure comparability between groups, propensity score matching was performed.

Results

Among 333 patients, powered staplers were used in 69.1% and manual staplers in 30.9%. The overall AL rate was 15.0%. AL was significantly associated with higher BMI (28.1 vs. 26.6 kg/m²; p = .021), ASA ≥ 3 (64.0 vs. 46.0%; p = .019), diabetes mellitus (24.0 vs. 8.1%; p .001), open (34.0 vs. 19.1%) or converted surgeries (14.0 vs. 4.9%; p = .004) and greater intraoperative fluid administration (2548.1 vs. 2188.8 ml; p = .015). Most patients (72.1%) followed enhanced recovery concepts (FAST TRACK) with trend toward lower adherence in the AL cohort (n.s.).  After propensity score matching, AL occurred in 9.7% following powered circular stapling and 11.8% following manual circular stapling (n.s.).

Conclusion

In this cohort, powered stapling devices were not associated with lower anastomotic leakage rates compared with manual staplers for transanal circular anastomosis in patients managed under modern minimally invasive and FAST TRACK concepts.