Scholarlink

Purpose <p>High-risk colon cancer may benefit from preoperative chemotherapy (preCHT), but evidence on its short-term safety and outcome is limited. Population-based evidence before its incorporation into national guidelines is lacking.</p> Methods <p>Patients with final weighted stage II–III colon cancer undergoing elective resection between 2007 and 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients planned for preCHT, irrespective of intention, were compared with those undergoing upfront surgery. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality and 30-day major morbidity, defined as all medical and surgical complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 grade. Subgroup analyses examined cT4 disease, and multivariable logistic regression was performed.</p> Results <p>Among 20,185 eligible patients, 299 (1.5%) received preCHT. Postoperative mortality was comparable (1.7% vs. 1.7%, <i>p</i> = 1.00 at 30 days and 3.0% vs. 2.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.82 at 90 days). Overall and surgical postoperative morbidity (CD ≥ 3) was higher in the preCHT group (34.1 vs. 25.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and 17.4% vs. 13.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), rates of anastomotic leakage were similar (3.3% vs. 3.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.85). Compared to upfront surgery, the preCHT group was more likely to undergo multivisceral resections (53.9% vs. 13.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with a higher rate of R1 resections (6.4% vs. 3.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), reflecting more advanced disease (cT4: 59.5% vs. 10.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; cN1-2: 54.9% vs. 28.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In the cT4 subgroup, short-term outcomes were comparable, and regression analyses found no independent association between preCHT and mortality or major morbidity.</p> Conclusion <p>PreCHT appeared feasible in cT4N0-2M0 colon cancer, with short-term outcomes comparable to upfront surgery despite more advanced primary tumour and greater surgical extent.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer and short-term outcomes—a nationwide cohort study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月9日

查看全文
  • M. Delorme,
  • E. Agger,
  • F. Jörgren,
  • M. L. Lydrup,
  • H. Hagman,
  • P. Buchwald

摘要

Purpose

High-risk colon cancer may benefit from preoperative chemotherapy (preCHT), but evidence on its short-term safety and outcome is limited. Population-based evidence before its incorporation into national guidelines is lacking.

Methods

Patients with final weighted stage II–III colon cancer undergoing elective resection between 2007 and 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients planned for preCHT, irrespective of intention, were compared with those undergoing upfront surgery. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality and 30-day major morbidity, defined as all medical and surgical complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 grade. Subgroup analyses examined cT4 disease, and multivariable logistic regression was performed.

Results

Among 20,185 eligible patients, 299 (1.5%) received preCHT. Postoperative mortality was comparable (1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.00 at 30 days and 3.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.82 at 90 days). Overall and surgical postoperative morbidity (CD ≥ 3) was higher in the preCHT group (34.1 vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001 and 17.4% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), rates of anastomotic leakage were similar (3.3% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.85). Compared to upfront surgery, the preCHT group was more likely to undergo multivisceral resections (53.9% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of R1 resections (6.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), reflecting more advanced disease (cT4: 59.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001; cN1-2: 54.9% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). In the cT4 subgroup, short-term outcomes were comparable, and regression analyses found no independent association between preCHT and mortality or major morbidity.

Conclusion

PreCHT appeared feasible in cT4N0-2M0 colon cancer, with short-term outcomes comparable to upfront surgery despite more advanced primary tumour and greater surgical extent.