Purpose <p>This study aimed to explore a combined transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and radiomics model for predicting tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).</p> Methods <p>Among 190 patients with LARC, 53 belonged to GRG and 137 to PRG. Eight TRUS parameters were identified as statistically significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) for distinguishing between the groups, including PSV<sub>pre</sub>, LD<sub>post</sub>, TD<sub>post</sub>, CEUS-IG<sub>post</sub>, LD change rate, TD change rate, RI change rate, and CEUS-IG downgrade. The accuracies of these individual parameters in predicting TRG were 0.42, 0.62, 0.56, 0.68, 0.67, 0.70, 0.63, and 0.71, respectively. The AUC values were 0.596, 0.597, 0.630, 0.752, 0.686, 0.660, 0.650, and 0.666, respectively. The multi-parameter ultrasonic logistic regression (MPU-LR) model achieved an accuracy of 0.816 and an AUC of 0.851 (95% CI: [0.792–0.909]). The optimal pre- and post-treatment radiomics models were RF (Mean-PCA-RFE-6) and AE (Zscore-PCA-RFE-12), with accuracies of 0.563 and 0.596 and AUCs of 0.601 (95% CI: [0.561–0.641]) and 0.662 (95% CI: [0.630–0.694]), respectively. The combined model (US-RAD<sub>pre</sub>-RAD<sub>post</sub>) showed the highest predictive power with accuracy and AUC of 0.863 and 0.913.</p> Conclusions <p>The combined model based on TRUS and radiomics demonstrated remarkable predictive capability for TRG after NCRT. It serves as a precision tool for assessing NCRT response in patients with LARC, impacting treatment strategies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Combined transrectal ultrasound and radiomics model for evaluating the therapeutic effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

  • Dilimire Abuliezi,
  • Yufen She,
  • Zhongfan Liao,
  • Yuan Luo,
  • Yin Yang,
  • Qin Huang,
  • Anqi Tao,
  • Hua Zhuang

摘要

Purpose

This study aimed to explore a combined transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and radiomics model for predicting tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

Among 190 patients with LARC, 53 belonged to GRG and 137 to PRG. Eight TRUS parameters were identified as statistically significant (P < 0.05) for distinguishing between the groups, including PSVpre, LDpost, TDpost, CEUS-IGpost, LD change rate, TD change rate, RI change rate, and CEUS-IG downgrade. The accuracies of these individual parameters in predicting TRG were 0.42, 0.62, 0.56, 0.68, 0.67, 0.70, 0.63, and 0.71, respectively. The AUC values were 0.596, 0.597, 0.630, 0.752, 0.686, 0.660, 0.650, and 0.666, respectively. The multi-parameter ultrasonic logistic regression (MPU-LR) model achieved an accuracy of 0.816 and an AUC of 0.851 (95% CI: [0.792–0.909]). The optimal pre- and post-treatment radiomics models were RF (Mean-PCA-RFE-6) and AE (Zscore-PCA-RFE-12), with accuracies of 0.563 and 0.596 and AUCs of 0.601 (95% CI: [0.561–0.641]) and 0.662 (95% CI: [0.630–0.694]), respectively. The combined model (US-RADpre-RADpost) showed the highest predictive power with accuracy and AUC of 0.863 and 0.913.

Conclusions

The combined model based on TRUS and radiomics demonstrated remarkable predictive capability for TRG after NCRT. It serves as a precision tool for assessing NCRT response in patients with LARC, impacting treatment strategies.