<p>Field-applied manure is a key source of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from agriculture, but effects of manure distribution on emissions are poorly understood. With a 28-day incubation experiment we investigated how the distribution of cattle slurry (rate: 100&#xa0;kg total N ha<sup>− 1</sup>) influenced mineral N dynamics and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, and sources, when incubated at one of three matric potentials (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\psi_m\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, -30, -50 or -100&#xa0;hPa, that corresponded to 67, 59 and 51% water-filled pore space, respectively. At each <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\psi_m\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, manure was either mixed homogeneously with soil or placed as a layer between two soil phases, or no manure was added. To investigate sources of N<sub>2</sub>O, soil NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> was enriched with <sup>15</sup>N. Mineral N dynamics, CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes, and <sup>15</sup>N enrichment of soil NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and N<sub>2</sub>O, were monitored. The effects of distribution were dramatic, the mixed slurry showing 4–13 times higher N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared to the discrete distribution, equivalent to 0.47–4.8% and 0.09–0.36% of the N applied, respectively. At -30&#xa0;hPa the high N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> removal occurred mainly during the first week with mixed distribution, and denitrification accounted for up to 81% of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. In contrast, the N<sub>2</sub>O emissions with discrete distribution declined by day 3 and much less NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> was consumed. Nitrification was apparently the main source of N<sub>2</sub>O in this treatment as well as all treatments at -50 and − 100&#xa0;hPa. Nitrate availability probably explained the higher N<sub>2</sub>O emissions with mixed compared to discrete manure distribution. The effects of distribution have important implications for models which assume a uniform distribution of degradable C and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> in the soil.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Manure distribution interacts with soil moisture and nitrate availability in controlling soil N2O emissions

  • Winnie Ntinyari,
  • Søren O. Petersen

摘要

Field-applied manure is a key source of N2O emissions from agriculture, but effects of manure distribution on emissions are poorly understood. With a 28-day incubation experiment we investigated how the distribution of cattle slurry (rate: 100 kg total N ha− 1) influenced mineral N dynamics and N2O emissions, and sources, when incubated at one of three matric potentials ( \(\:\psi_m\) , -30, -50 or -100 hPa, that corresponded to 67, 59 and 51% water-filled pore space, respectively. At each \(\:\psi_m\) , manure was either mixed homogeneously with soil or placed as a layer between two soil phases, or no manure was added. To investigate sources of N2O, soil NO3 was enriched with 15N. Mineral N dynamics, CO2 and N2O fluxes, and 15N enrichment of soil NO3 and N2O, were monitored. The effects of distribution were dramatic, the mixed slurry showing 4–13 times higher N2O emissions compared to the discrete distribution, equivalent to 0.47–4.8% and 0.09–0.36% of the N applied, respectively. At -30 hPa the high N2O emissions and NO3 removal occurred mainly during the first week with mixed distribution, and denitrification accounted for up to 81% of N2O emissions. In contrast, the N2O emissions with discrete distribution declined by day 3 and much less NO3 was consumed. Nitrification was apparently the main source of N2O in this treatment as well as all treatments at -50 and − 100 hPa. Nitrate availability probably explained the higher N2O emissions with mixed compared to discrete manure distribution. The effects of distribution have important implications for models which assume a uniform distribution of degradable C and NO3 in the soil.