<p>We consider the classical problem of allocating <i>m</i> objects to <i>n</i> agents where <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(m \ge n.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> In the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(m=n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> case, we analyze preference domains (called UPN-priority domains) where every strategy-proof, non-bossy and unanimous profile neutral (UPN) allocation rule is a priority rule. We show that a simple condition called the closure property characterizes priority domains. The only domain satisfying the closure property and a mild richness condition is the universal domain. We extend this result to the <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(m &gt;n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> case. We also consider the case where allocation rules satisfy a stronger neutrality property.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Priority domains

  • Arunava Sen,
  • Ankit Singh

摘要

We consider the classical problem of allocating m objects to n agents where \(m \ge n.\) m n . In the \(m=n\) m = n case, we analyze preference domains (called UPN-priority domains) where every strategy-proof, non-bossy and unanimous profile neutral (UPN) allocation rule is a priority rule. We show that a simple condition called the closure property characterizes priority domains. The only domain satisfying the closure property and a mild richness condition is the universal domain. We extend this result to the \(m >n\) m > n case. We also consider the case where allocation rules satisfy a stronger neutrality property.