<p>Harsanyi’s seminal aggregation theorem axiomatized weighted utilitarianism based on expected utility theory. However, the weights assigned to each individual cannot be separated from the individual’s utility. We show that once we depart from the expected utility framework, it is possible to uniquely identify the utilities and the weights. Specifically, we show that in the min-of-means social welfare function if each individual has a cardinal utility, unique up to a positive affine transformation, and any redistribution of utilities changes the social welfare for some initial allocation, then we can uniquely identify the utilities of the individuals and the weights of the social welfare function.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Observable interpersonal utility comparisons

  • Lasse Mononen

摘要

Harsanyi’s seminal aggregation theorem axiomatized weighted utilitarianism based on expected utility theory. However, the weights assigned to each individual cannot be separated from the individual’s utility. We show that once we depart from the expected utility framework, it is possible to uniquely identify the utilities and the weights. Specifically, we show that in the min-of-means social welfare function if each individual has a cardinal utility, unique up to a positive affine transformation, and any redistribution of utilities changes the social welfare for some initial allocation, then we can uniquely identify the utilities of the individuals and the weights of the social welfare function.