<p>In this study, the aerodynamic characteristics of a full-scale, isolated passenger car wheel equipped with three rim configurations—a five-spoke rim, an aerodynamic rim, and a closed rim—were experimentally investigated in a wind tunnel. A dual-balance system was developed to measure the drag, lift, and side force of the wheel. The wake flow behind the wheel was assessed using a 14-hole pressure probe. The numerical simulation was employed to assist in analyzing the aerodynamic flow phenomena underlying the observed forces. The results indicated that the drag coefficients for the aerodynamic and closed rim configurations decreased by approximately 10<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\%$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>%</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as the Reynolds number increased from 7.8 <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\times $</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$10^{5}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>5</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to 1.56 <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\times $</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$10^{6}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>6</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, whereas the coefficient for the five-spoke rim setup remained nearly constant. Additionally, drag measurements obtained using the dual-balance system were approximately 8<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\%$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>%</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> lower than those recorded with a single-balance setup. Furthermore, the difference in drag between different rim configurations significantly increased with increasing wheel yaw angles. Notably, the closed rim design exhibited 15.2<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\%$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>%</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> less drag than the five-spoke rim at a 0<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$^{\circ }$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∘</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> yaw angle and 48.2<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\%$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>%</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> less drag at a 20<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$^{\circ }$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∘</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> yaw angle.</p>

Aerodynamic characterization of an isolated rotating wheel in ground contact using dual-balance measurements

期刊论文
发表日期：

2026年7月1日

查看全文

Fengli Zhang,
Wei Yi,
Wenjiang Wang,
Qiuli Luo,
Rongrong Zhang,
Xianzhong He,
Qingyang Wang,
Shunlin Tang

摘要

In this study, the aerodynamic characteristics of a full-scale, isolated passenger car wheel equipped with three rim configurations—a five-spoke rim, an aerodynamic rim, and a closed rim—were experimentally investigated in a wind tunnel. A dual-balance system was developed to measure the drag, lift, and side force of the wheel. The wake flow behind the wheel was assessed using a 14-hole pressure probe. The numerical simulation was employed to assist in analyzing the aerodynamic flow phenomena underlying the observed forces. The results indicated that the drag coefficients for the aerodynamic and closed rim configurations decreased by approximately 10 $\%$ $%$ as the Reynolds number increased from 7.8 $\times $ $\times$ $10^{5}$ $10^{5}$ to 1.56 $\times $ $\times$ $10^{6}$ $10^{6}$ , whereas the coefficient for the five-spoke rim setup remained nearly constant. Additionally, drag measurements obtained using the dual-balance system were approximately 8 $\%$ $%$ lower than those recorded with a single-balance setup. Furthermore, the difference in drag between different rim configurations significantly increased with increasing wheel yaw angles. Notably, the closed rim design exhibited 15.2 $\%$ $%$ less drag than the five-spoke rim at a 0 $^{\circ }$ $^{\circ}$ yaw angle and 48.2 $\%$ $%$ less drag at a 20 $^{\circ }$ $^{\circ}$ yaw angle.