Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To investigate the heterogeneity of treatment response in patients with concomitant Overactive Bladder (OAB) syndrome and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), including diarrhea-predominant (IBS-D), constipation-predominant (IBS-C), and mixed-type (IBS-M), by stratifying outcomes by both treatment strategy and IBS subtype. We hypothesized that IBS subtype would predict therapeutic response and define distinct mechanistic phenotypes.</p> Methods <p>In this prospective, observational cohort study (<i>N</i> = 144, screened from 259), patients were allocated to one of four non-randomized cohorts: OAB-Targeted Monotherapy (OAB-TM, <i>n</i> = 45), OAB-Targeted Dual Therapy (OAB-TD, <i>n</i> = 29), IBS-Targeted Monotherapy (IBS-TM, <i>n</i> = 47), or IBS-Targeted Dual Therapy (IBS-TD, <i>n</i> = 23). Outcomes included changes in OABSS, IBS-SSS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and QOL scores over 8 weeks. Efficacy was compared using ANCOVA, adjusted for baseline scores. Objective data from uroflowmetry parameters and baseline predictors of response were analyzed.</p> Results <p>Dual therapy demonstrated superior improvement over monotherapy across all symptom, mood, and QOL domains. However, stratified analysis revealed significant heterogeneity. In the IBS-targeted cohort, the superiority of dual therapy for OAB improvement was highly significant in the IBS-D subtype but not in IBS-M or IBS-C subtypes. This corresponded to distinct baseline uroflowmetry parameters: IBS-D patients typically showed high-peak tower-shaped curves, while IBS-C patients showed staccato patterns. Furthermore, baseline anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) scores significantly predicted OAB cross-organ improvement in the IBS-TM cohort.</p> Conclusion <p>OAB-IBS comorbidity is not a monolithic entity but comprises distinct clinical phenotypes (pelvic floor-driven, central sensitization-driven, bladder-primary). These findings suggest that a uniform treatment protocol may be suboptimal, supporting a precision-medicine framework where management is tailored based on the patient’s specific IBS subtype.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Irritable bowel syndrome subtype predicts treatment response and defines distinct mechanistic phenotypes in OAB-IBS comorbidity: a prospective observational study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月25日

查看全文
  • Qi Sun,
  • Yubo Gao,
  • Xinhang Shi,
  • Ming Xie,
  • Jun Zheng,
  • Xunguo Yang,
  • Lin Yang,
  • Rulin Liao,
  • Cunzhen Ma,
  • Zhuohang Li,
  • Boyuan Sun,
  • Bisheng Cheng,
  • Peng Wu

摘要

Purpose

To investigate the heterogeneity of treatment response in patients with concomitant Overactive Bladder (OAB) syndrome and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), including diarrhea-predominant (IBS-D), constipation-predominant (IBS-C), and mixed-type (IBS-M), by stratifying outcomes by both treatment strategy and IBS subtype. We hypothesized that IBS subtype would predict therapeutic response and define distinct mechanistic phenotypes.

Methods

In this prospective, observational cohort study (N = 144, screened from 259), patients were allocated to one of four non-randomized cohorts: OAB-Targeted Monotherapy (OAB-TM, n = 45), OAB-Targeted Dual Therapy (OAB-TD, n = 29), IBS-Targeted Monotherapy (IBS-TM, n = 47), or IBS-Targeted Dual Therapy (IBS-TD, n = 23). Outcomes included changes in OABSS, IBS-SSS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and QOL scores over 8 weeks. Efficacy was compared using ANCOVA, adjusted for baseline scores. Objective data from uroflowmetry parameters and baseline predictors of response were analyzed.

Results

Dual therapy demonstrated superior improvement over monotherapy across all symptom, mood, and QOL domains. However, stratified analysis revealed significant heterogeneity. In the IBS-targeted cohort, the superiority of dual therapy for OAB improvement was highly significant in the IBS-D subtype but not in IBS-M or IBS-C subtypes. This corresponded to distinct baseline uroflowmetry parameters: IBS-D patients typically showed high-peak tower-shaped curves, while IBS-C patients showed staccato patterns. Furthermore, baseline anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) scores significantly predicted OAB cross-organ improvement in the IBS-TM cohort.

Conclusion

OAB-IBS comorbidity is not a monolithic entity but comprises distinct clinical phenotypes (pelvic floor-driven, central sensitization-driven, bladder-primary). These findings suggest that a uniform treatment protocol may be suboptimal, supporting a precision-medicine framework where management is tailored based on the patient’s specific IBS subtype.