Scholarlink

Purpose <p>This study aimed to determine whether thulium laser–assisted tumor bed hemostasis could provide effective bleeding control comparable to conventional suture renorrhaphy while minimizing ischemic exposure, parenchymal trauma, and profibrotic response. Specifically, we compared perioperative outcomes, renal functional preservation, and urinary fibrosis biomarker profiles between the two techniques during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).</p> Methods <p>In this prospective randomized trial (March 2024–September 2025), 48 patients with clinical T1 renal masses and a normal contralateral kidney were assigned to thulium laser-assisted LPN (LLPN) or conventional LPN (CLPN). In LLPN, tumor bed hemostasis was achieved with a 2-μm continuous thulium laser followed by cortical closure, while CLPN employed standard medullary and cortical renorrhaphy. Perioperative outcomes, renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR), and urinary fibrosis biomarkers (transforming growth factor-β1 [TGF-β1], monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1]) were assessed preoperatively and on postoperative day 1, and at 1 and 3&#xa0;months.</p> Results <p>Forty-three patients (LLPN 23, CLPN 20) were analyzed. Operative time and warm ischemia time were shorter in LLPN than CLPN (95 vs. 121&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 13 vs. 17&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> = 0.037). LLPN required fewer sutures (8 vs. 14, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and resulted in lower blood loss (150 vs. 300&#xa0;mL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). All complications were low-grade and comparable. eGFR declined significantly in both groups, with partial recovery in LLPN but not CLPN; between-group differences were not significant. Urinary TGF-β1 and MCP-1 increased postoperatively in both groups but were consistently lower in LLPN at all time points (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Conclusion <p>Thulium laser coagulation during LPN reduces ischemia, blood loss, and suture requirement without compromising safety or short-term renal function. The attenuated rise in fibrosis biomarkers suggests a potential long-term nephron-sparing advantage.</p> <p>The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06322745, registered March 14, 2024).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Randomized trial of thulium laser-assisted tumor bed coagulation versus conventional suture renorrhaphy in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact on perioperative outcomes and fibrosis biomarker response

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月17日

查看全文
  • Ehab Atallah,
  • Abdullah Dawoud,
  • Abul-fotouh Ahmed,
  • Abdelrahman Ebeid,
  • Ahmed Soliman,
  • Hassan Abdelazim,
  • Awatef Soliman,
  • Samar Abdelhamid,
  • Aly M. Abdel-karim

摘要

Purpose

This study aimed to determine whether thulium laser–assisted tumor bed hemostasis could provide effective bleeding control comparable to conventional suture renorrhaphy while minimizing ischemic exposure, parenchymal trauma, and profibrotic response. Specifically, we compared perioperative outcomes, renal functional preservation, and urinary fibrosis biomarker profiles between the two techniques during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Methods

In this prospective randomized trial (March 2024–September 2025), 48 patients with clinical T1 renal masses and a normal contralateral kidney were assigned to thulium laser-assisted LPN (LLPN) or conventional LPN (CLPN). In LLPN, tumor bed hemostasis was achieved with a 2-μm continuous thulium laser followed by cortical closure, while CLPN employed standard medullary and cortical renorrhaphy. Perioperative outcomes, renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR), and urinary fibrosis biomarkers (transforming growth factor-β1 [TGF-β1], monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1]) were assessed preoperatively and on postoperative day 1, and at 1 and 3 months.

Results

Forty-three patients (LLPN 23, CLPN 20) were analyzed. Operative time and warm ischemia time were shorter in LLPN than CLPN (95 vs. 121 min, p = 0.001; 13 vs. 17 min, p = 0.037). LLPN required fewer sutures (8 vs. 14, p < 0.001) and resulted in lower blood loss (150 vs. 300 mL, p < 0.001). All complications were low-grade and comparable. eGFR declined significantly in both groups, with partial recovery in LLPN but not CLPN; between-group differences were not significant. Urinary TGF-β1 and MCP-1 increased postoperatively in both groups but were consistently lower in LLPN at all time points (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Thulium laser coagulation during LPN reduces ischemia, blood loss, and suture requirement without compromising safety or short-term renal function. The attenuated rise in fibrosis biomarkers suggests a potential long-term nephron-sparing advantage.

The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06322745, registered March 14, 2024).