Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To describe the availability and use of enhanced endoscopic imaging technology as well as the factors that impact endoscopic imaging method preferences in the treatment of NMIBC.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional online survey was prepared to capture real-life practices globally, in the endoscopic assessment and treatment of NMIBC. The survey was distributed by the Société Internationale d’Urologie (SIU) to all its members and made available in 7 languages. The data was reported quantitatively, measuring variability and central tendency.</p> Results <p>From the 3595 respondents (across 91 countries) 39.1% were in practice for &gt; 20&#xa0;years and 56,5% were general urologists, followed by 16.8% uro-oncologist and 8.4% endourologist. White light (WL) was the most often available endoscopic technology. Of the respondents, 60% perform &lt; 5 TURBT/month and only 15% perform &gt; 10 TURBT/month. 64% of the respondents had only access to WL endoscopy whereas 29% of the respondents had access to NBI, 11% to PDD and 6% to IMAGE 1S. The majority agreed on their benefit in tumor resection, detection of satellite lesions and decrease recurrence rate in pT1 tumors. Lastly, half of the respondents reported not having followed any training on the use of enhanced techniques.</p> Conclusion <p>Overall, there is the belief that the use of enhanced imaging techniques allows for a more complete TURBT and to prevent recurrences. Notably most respondents performed less than 5 TURBTs/month, and the highest volume is performed by general urologists. Respondents predominantly have access to WL endoscopy only, mostly due to income, work setting, and lack of training.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The worldwide adoption of enhanced endoscopic imaging in diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): snapshot analysis from a global survey

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月14日

查看全文
  • Fatima Bekiroglu,
  • Amin Abdulmajeed,
  • Aleyna Aydin,
  • Pilar Laguna,
  • Guohua Zeng,
  • Valentin Pavlov,
  • Mehmet Kocak,
  • Rahim Horuz,
  • Selami Albayrak,
  • Jean de la Rosette,
  • Vineet Gauhar,
  • Raed A Azhar,
  • Peter Ka-Fung Chiu,
  • Vincenzo Ficarra,
  • Nguyen Phuc Cam Hoang,
  • Norio Nonomura,
  • Takahiro Yasui,
  • Teng Aik Ong,
  • Ranan Dasgupta,
  • Sung Kyu Hong,
  • Mohamad A Moussa,
  • Nibbras I Al-Hamdani,
  • Mohamed Jalloh,
  • Alexey G Martov,
  • Athanasios E Dellis,
  • Hans-Peter Schmid,
  • Victor Cavadas,
  • Shingai Mutambirwa,
  • Andreas Neisius,
  • Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried,
  • Mumtaz Ahmad,
  • Keshavamurthy Ramaiah,
  • Yasser Farahat,
  • Li-Ping Xie,
  • Thiago Camelo Mourão,
  • Karin Marise Jaeger Anzolch,
  • Madhu Sudan Agrawal,
  • Besut Daryanto,
  • Paksi Satyagraha,
  • Vincent Estrade,
  • Mohamed S Al-Marhoon,
  • Piotr Chlosta,
  • Ingrid Perscky,
  • Tania González León,
  • Fernando Marchant Gonzalez,
  • Patrick Gitobu Mburugu,
  • Ates Kadioglu,
  • Bülent Erkurt,
  • Wen-Jeng Wu,
  • Abbas Basiri,
  • Arturo Mendoza-Valdés,
  • Lukas Lussuardi,
  • Tohid,
  • Nick Crisan,
  • Abdullatif El-terki,
  • Abdel Rahman Zahran,
  • Stavros Gravas,
  • Mohamed Harouni,
  • Kamel Ait El Haidj,
  • Zribi Ahmed Said,
  • Sami Ben Rhouma,
  • Elmcherqui Mostafa,
  • Gustavo Villoldo,
  • Refaat Amusamra

摘要

Purpose

To describe the availability and use of enhanced endoscopic imaging technology as well as the factors that impact endoscopic imaging method preferences in the treatment of NMIBC.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was prepared to capture real-life practices globally, in the endoscopic assessment and treatment of NMIBC. The survey was distributed by the Société Internationale d’Urologie (SIU) to all its members and made available in 7 languages. The data was reported quantitatively, measuring variability and central tendency.

Results

From the 3595 respondents (across 91 countries) 39.1% were in practice for > 20 years and 56,5% were general urologists, followed by 16.8% uro-oncologist and 8.4% endourologist. White light (WL) was the most often available endoscopic technology. Of the respondents, 60% perform < 5 TURBT/month and only 15% perform > 10 TURBT/month. 64% of the respondents had only access to WL endoscopy whereas 29% of the respondents had access to NBI, 11% to PDD and 6% to IMAGE 1S. The majority agreed on their benefit in tumor resection, detection of satellite lesions and decrease recurrence rate in pT1 tumors. Lastly, half of the respondents reported not having followed any training on the use of enhanced techniques.

Conclusion

Overall, there is the belief that the use of enhanced imaging techniques allows for a more complete TURBT and to prevent recurrences. Notably most respondents performed less than 5 TURBTs/month, and the highest volume is performed by general urologists. Respondents predominantly have access to WL endoscopy only, mostly due to income, work setting, and lack of training.