Purpose <p>Previous studies have reported an increased risk of bladder cancer (BC) in IC/BPS patients. In this study, we re-examined the BC risk in a population based IC/BPS cohort to assess the potential detection bias caused by some IC/BPS patients diagnosed who might already have co-existing BC.</p> Methods <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study based on a Research Database by extracting IC/BPS patients diagnosed within years 2002–2013. The patients in the study cohorts were identified based on at least 2 IC/BPS diagnoses and excluded patients with BC occurred before IC/BPS diagnosis. The primary outcome was BC events detected. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated for matching IC/BPS cohort with non-IC/BPS cohort on a 1:1 basis. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was then used to compare hazard ratios of BC development between 2 cohorts.</p> Results <p>By excluding patients with BC diagnosed within 1&#xa0;year after IC/BPS diagnosis, the study&#xa0;cohort was insignificantly different from the PS-matched control (Model 1, <i>p</i> = 0.219) but significantly different from the non-PS-matched control (Model 2, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, when including patients with BC diagnosed within 1&#xa0;year after IC/BPS diagnosis, the study cohort was significantly different from both PS-matched (Model 3, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and non-PS-matched (Model 4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) controls, indicating that excluding patients with BC diagnosed within 1&#xa0;year after IC/BPS diagnosis and adopting PS matching method greatly reduce the BC detection bias.</p> Conclusions <p>IC/BPS is not associated with BC. The detection bias of previous studies may result from inadequate recruitments of study cohorts or improper matching of control cohorts.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

IC/BPS is not associated with bladder cancer: a nationwide propensity score matched cohort study in Taiwan

  • Ming-Huei Lee,
  • Huei-Ching Wu,
  • Wei-Chih Chen,
  • Yung-Fu Chen

摘要

Purpose

Previous studies have reported an increased risk of bladder cancer (BC) in IC/BPS patients. In this study, we re-examined the BC risk in a population based IC/BPS cohort to assess the potential detection bias caused by some IC/BPS patients diagnosed who might already have co-existing BC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study based on a Research Database by extracting IC/BPS patients diagnosed within years 2002–2013. The patients in the study cohorts were identified based on at least 2 IC/BPS diagnoses and excluded patients with BC occurred before IC/BPS diagnosis. The primary outcome was BC events detected. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated for matching IC/BPS cohort with non-IC/BPS cohort on a 1:1 basis. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was then used to compare hazard ratios of BC development between 2 cohorts.

Results

By excluding patients with BC diagnosed within 1 year after IC/BPS diagnosis, the study cohort was insignificantly different from the PS-matched control (Model 1, p = 0.219) but significantly different from the non-PS-matched control (Model 2, p < 0.001). However, when including patients with BC diagnosed within 1 year after IC/BPS diagnosis, the study cohort was significantly different from both PS-matched (Model 3, p = 0.002) and non-PS-matched (Model 4, p < 0.001) controls, indicating that excluding patients with BC diagnosed within 1 year after IC/BPS diagnosis and adopting PS matching method greatly reduce the BC detection bias.

Conclusions

IC/BPS is not associated with BC. The detection bias of previous studies may result from inadequate recruitments of study cohorts or improper matching of control cohorts.