Scholarlink

<p>My comments concern the important error in the structure analysis of the studied sample. The presented structural data do not correspond to (BiFeO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.80</sub>(MgTiO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.20</sub>, as supposed by authors. The numerical data are copied from BiFe<sub>0.75</sub>Mn<sub>0.25</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but the diffraction pattern is similar to BiMg<sub>0.5</sub>Ti<sub>0.5</sub>O<sub>3</sub> crystal. This should be treated as a case of unacceptable data manipulation. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Some strange data presented in the paper on "Improved multifunctional features in BiFeO3 solid solution due to partial substitution of MgTiO3" by S. Sen et al., and published in Appl. Phys. A (2022) 128:1054

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月13日

查看全文
  • Paweł E. Tomaszewski

摘要

My comments concern the important error in the structure analysis of the studied sample. The presented structural data do not correspond to (BiFeO3)0.80(MgTiO3)0.20, as supposed by authors. The numerical data are copied from BiFe0.75Mn0.25O3 but the diffraction pattern is similar to BiMg0.5Ti0.5O3 crystal. This should be treated as a case of unacceptable data manipulation.