Objective To assess public attitudes toward prospective disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging (i.e., informing patients in advance about the possibility a radiologic examination may yield an incorrect finding, rather than disclosure of an error after it has occurred) and to identify factors influencing these preferences. Materials and methods A population-based survey was conducted in the Netherlands. Participants aged ≥ 18 years (n = 1524) responded to CT-scan vignettes describing pre-procedural potential diagnostic errors, varying by patient age (9, 26, 46, or 71 years) and probability of incorrect findings (< 0.1%, < 1%, < 5%, or unspecified). For case vignettes involving 9-year-old patients, participants responded as parents/guardians. Agreement with “I would want to be informed” was measured using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree). Results Overall, 88.4% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that patients should be informed about the risk of diagnostic errors. Patient age and diagnostic error risk significantly influenced agreement. Compared with vignettes describing a 71-year-old patient, younger patient ages were associated with higher odds of agreement (9-year-old OR 4.023, p = 0.010; 26-year-old OR 3.222, p = 0.019; 46-year-old OR 2.659, p = 0.022). Compared with vignettes in which diagnostic error risk was unspecified, specifying risks of < 0.1% or < 1% was associated with lower odds of agreement (< 0.1% risk: OR 0.476, p < 0.001; < 1% risk: OR 0.635, p = 0.002), whereas a < 5% risk was not (OR 0.876, p = 0.360). Conclusion Public support for prospective disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging is high in the Dutch population, particularly for younger patients and higher-risk scenarios. Key Points <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> Most adults in the Netherlands support disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging, particularly for younger patients and higher-risk scenarios. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> Public preferences for disclosure are driven by patient age and error probability, rather than participant demographics or prior radiology experience. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> Public support for disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging is high in the Dutch population, especially for younger patients and higher-risk scenarios. Graphical Abstract

Pre-procedural disclosure of potential diagnostic errors in radiology: public perspectives in the Netherlands

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年6月3日

查看全文

Thomas C. Kwee,
Yfke Ongena,
Marieke Haan,
Derya Yakar

摘要

Objective

To assess public attitudes toward prospective disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging (i.e., informing patients in advance about the possibility a radiologic examination may yield an incorrect finding, rather than disclosure of an error after it has occurred) and to identify factors influencing these preferences.

Materials and methods

A population-based survey was conducted in the Netherlands. Participants aged ≥ 18 years (n = 1524) responded to CT-scan vignettes describing pre-procedural potential diagnostic errors, varying by patient age (9, 26, 46, or 71 years) and probability of incorrect findings (< 0.1%, < 1%, < 5%, or unspecified). For case vignettes involving 9-year-old patients, participants responded as parents/guardians. Agreement with “I would want to be informed” was measured using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree).

Results

Overall, 88.4% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that patients should be informed about the risk of diagnostic errors. Patient age and diagnostic error risk significantly influenced agreement. Compared with vignettes describing a 71-year-old patient, younger patient ages were associated with higher odds of agreement (9-year-old OR 4.023, p = 0.010; 26-year-old OR 3.222, p = 0.019; 46-year-old OR 2.659, p = 0.022). Compared with vignettes in which diagnostic error risk was unspecified, specifying risks of < 0.1% or < 1% was associated with lower odds of agreement (< 0.1% risk: OR 0.476, p < 0.001; < 1% risk: OR 0.635, p = 0.002), whereas a < 5% risk was not (OR 0.876, p = 0.360).

Conclusion

Public support for prospective disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging is high in the Dutch population, particularly for younger patients and higher-risk scenarios.

Key Points

Question Most adults in the Netherlands support disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging, particularly for younger patients and higher-risk scenarios.

Findings Public preferences for disclosure are driven by patient age and error probability, rather than participant demographics or prior radiology experience.

Clinical relevance Public support for disclosure of diagnostic error risk in radiologic imaging is high in the Dutch population, especially for younger patients and higher-risk scenarios.

Graphical Abstract