Negligible impact of perifissural nodules in an AI-first reader workflow from UK lung screening trial
摘要
To evaluate the effect of perifissural nodules (PFNs) on radiologist workload within an AI-first reader workflow for lung cancer screening, given that AI cannot morphologically classify benign PFNs measuring ≥ 100 mm3.
Materials and methodsOne thousand two hundred fifty baseline low-dose CT scans from the UK Lung Screening (UKLS) Trial were analyzed. A commercially available AI software automatically identified all nodules with solid components ≥ 100 mm³ per the NELSON 2.0-European Position Statement (EUPS) guideline. Three readers independently performed PFN classification, with a senior radiologist with over 20 years of experience performing an arbitration read for the final reference classification (typical PFN, atypical PFN, or non-PFN). Histological outcomes for all fissure-attached nodules were reviewed to confirm benignity. The proportion of participants where a benign typical PFN was the sole finding of nodule presence ≥ 100 mm³ was calculated, representing the extra workload for radiologists to review.
ResultsA total of 1252 participants (mean age, 68.5 ± 4.0 years; 928 men [74%]) were analyzed. AI detected 838 nodules with solid components ≥ 100 mm³ in 431 (34%) participants. 57 nodules in 49 (3.9%) participants were classified as typical PFNs by the reference standard. Only 24 of 1252 participants (1.9%) had a typical PFN ≥ 100 mm³ as the sole finding that added extra workload. No typical PFNs (0/57) were malignant.
ConclusionThe impact of typical PFNs on the maximum achievable radiologist workload reduction in an AI-first reader workflow is negligible, with only 1.9% of participants requiring additional radiologist review triggered solely by these benign nodules.
Key Points