Deep endometriosis: evaluation of ENZIAN and #ENZIAN classification systems by MRI compared with surgery—a meta-analysis
摘要
To assess the reproducibility and the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the assessment of (#)ENZIAN classification in patients with deep endometriosis by means of a meta-analysis.
Materials and methodsMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant articles from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2025. Data on MRI reproducibility (interobserver/intraobserver kappa) were extracted for P (peritoneum), O (ovary), T (tubo-ovarian condition), A (vagina/rectovaginal space), B (utero-sacral ligaments), C (rectum/sigmoid colon), FA (F adenomyosis), FB (F bladder), FU (F ureter), FI (F intestinum), and FO (F other). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated for each compartment.
ResultsTwelve articles (1024 patients) were included, of which 7 used ENZIAN and 5 used #ENZIAN. MRI-based (#)ENZIAN showed high reliability for O, A, B, and C, with substantial or excellent agreement in most studies. MRI-based (#)ENZIAN showed high diagnostic values for O, T, A, B, and C. Sensitivity and specificity for O were 97.5% and 96.4% and for T, 94.1% and 89.1%, respectively. Sensitivity values for A, B, and C were slightly lower, but remained high at 76.1%, 83.4%, and 79.1% respectively, and specificity values were high at 92.4%, 87.8%, and 94.8%. Sensitivity values for FA, FB, and FI were low, with values of 64.6%, 56.9%, and 66.8%. Data for P, FU, and FO were insufficient and could not be pooled.
ConclusionMRI-based (#)ENZIAN showed high reliability for compartments O, T, A, B, and C. Data for other compartments were either insufficient or the diagnostic accuracy was low.
Key Points