CT-guided bone biopsies with non-diagnostic results in pediatric patients—a multi-institutional 10-year retrospective review
摘要
This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of CT-guided bone biopsies in pediatric patients, the outcome of non-diagnostic CT biopsy results, and to establish factors associated with non-diagnostic biopsy results.
Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive pediatric patients ≤ 21 years who underwent CT-guided bone biopsies in three tertiary referral hospitals from December 2011 to March 2022. Clinical information, pre-biopsy CT and MRI images, procedural details, pathological results, and follow-up were assessed. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Mann–Whitney U-test and unpaired t-test were used to compare non-parametric and parametric variables, respectively. Statistical significance was set a p < 0.05.
ResultsA total of 138 patients (mean age 13.9 ± 4.5 years; 95 (60%) male patients) with 157 CT-guided bone biopsies were studied, which yielded 38.2% (60/157) non-diagnostic, 23.6% (37/157) benign, and 38.2% (60/157) malignant results. Most non-diagnostic lesions (88.3% [53/60]) were subsequently determined to be benign. Factors associated with non-diagnostic biopsy results were cystic lesions (p = 0.003) incidental lesions (p = 0.03), fewer (p = 0.02) and shorter (p = 0.01) tissue cores, non-aggressive radiological features, including narrow zone of transition (p < 0.001), sclerotic margin (p < 0.001), no cortical destruction (p < 0.001), no periosteal reaction (p < 0.001), or no extra-osseous soft tissue mass (p < 0.001).
ConclusionAbout one-third of CT-guided bone biopsies in pediatric patients yielded non-diagnostic results, though most were ultimately confirmed to be benign. In children and adolescents with suspected primary bone tumors, CT-guided bone biopsy with non-diagnostic histopathological results strongly favors benignity in lesions with non-aggressive imaging features and should align management towards a more conservative approach.
Key Points